Peer Review reports
From: Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Jan 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Jan 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-016-0805-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.