Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Della Forster |
| 6 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait |
| 13 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar |
| 5 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait |
| 9 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Della Forster |
| 11 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar |
| 2 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-9-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.