Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Della Forster |
6 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait |
13 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar |
5 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Fairweather-Tait |
9 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Della Forster |
11 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shashi Chiplonkar |
2 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Hartman-Craven |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-9-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.