Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Gideon Koren |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
11 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel |
16 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anwar T. Merchant |
30 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gideon Koren |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
24 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anwar T. Merchant |
2 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel |
17 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gideon Koren |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
27 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gideon Koren |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
31 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Gideon Koren |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
31 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
4 Apr 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Apr 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-6-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.