Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Women’s views and experiences of antenatal care in Iraq: a Q methodology study

Original Submission
18 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nazar Shabila
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nazar Shabila
Resubmission - Version 3
21 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Bryant
1 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kun Huang
11 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Faerber
17 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janette Perz
27 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nazar Shabila
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Faerber
13 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janette Perz
19 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Bryant
1 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kun Huang
19 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Nazar Shabila
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
23 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-14-43

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page