Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Ediau |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Ediau |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katrien Beeckman |
31 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yenita agus |
2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Iqbal Ansary Khan |
4 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shigeko Horiuchi |
5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - munira sultana |
8 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Ediau |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shigeko Horiuchi |
28 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yenita agus |
8 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Ediau |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Iqbal Ansary Khan |
12 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - yenita agus |
26 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katrien Beeckman |
14 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Ediau |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Oct 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-13-189 |
You can find further information about peer review here.