Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
13 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wendy Hall |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
22 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda Kvist |
7 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Quinlivan |
6 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wendy Hall |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda Kvist |
10 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Wendy Hall |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Wendy Hall |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.