Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Guillermo Antinolo |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eleazar Soto |
2 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edi Vaisbuch |
5 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula Vargas Innocenti |
12 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Espinoza |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edi Vaisbuch |
26 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula Vargas Innocenti |
28 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eleazar Soto |
5 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Espinoza |
2 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Guillermo Antinolo |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
20 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-72 |
You can find further information about peer review here.