Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donal Brennan |
24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anibal Scarella |
15 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donal Brennan |
10 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anibal Scarella |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
24 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
21 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
27 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
27 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paola Colais |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
27 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
23 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-54 |
You can find further information about peer review here.