Table 3 Ownership of ITNs among participants
A | Participants' age group (years) | Owners | Non-owners | Level of significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | |||
18 - 19 | 1 | 0.7 | 2 | 1.1 | Chi-sq. = 4.381, df = 3, p-value = 0.223 | |
20 - 29 | 67 | 45.3 | 102 | 54.5 | ||
30 - 34 | 53 | 35.8 | 48 | 25.7 | ||
35 - 47 | 27 | 18.2 | 35 | 18.7 | ||
Total | 148 | 100.0 | 187 | 100.0 | ||
B | Participants' marriage type | N | % | N | % | Level of significance |
Monogamy | 134 | 91.2 | 150 | 81.1 | Chi-sq. = 8.924, df = 2, p-value = 0.12 | |
Polygamy | 12 | 8.2 | 35 | 18.9 | ||
No response | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
Total | 147 | 100.0 | 185 | 100.0 | ||
C | Participants' level of education | N | % | N | % | Level of significance |
No formal education | 2 | 1.4 | 4 | 2.2 | Chi-sq. = 24.132, df = 4, p-value = 0.000 | |
Primary education | 11 | 7.5 | 28 | 15.1 | ||
Junior secondary education | 5 | 3.4 | 14 | 7.5 | ||
Senior secondary education | 50 | 34.0 | 88 | 47.3 | ||
Tertiary education | 79 | 53.7 | 52 | 28.0 | ||
Total | 147 | 100.0 | 186 | 100.0 | ||
D | Participants' religion | N | % | N | % | Level of significance |
Christianity | 86 | 58.5 | 84 | 44.9 | Chi-sq. = 6.095, df = 2, p-value = 0.047 | |
Islam | 60 | 40.8 | 101 | 54.0 | ||
Tradition | 1 | 0.7 | 2 | 1.1 | ||
Total | 147 | 100.0 | 187 | 100.0 | ||
E | Participants' residential areas | N | % | N | % | Level of significance |
Densely populated | 115 | 79.3 | 133 | 71.9 | Chi-sq. = 6.037, df = 2, p-value = 0.049 | |
Low densely populated | 11 | 7.6 | 9 | 4.9 | ||
Slum | 19 | 13.1 | 43 | 23.2 | ||
Total | 145 | 100.0 | 185 | 100.0 | ||