Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Morton |
20 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Goodall |
26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Fenwick |
28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - peter danielian |
13 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allison Shorten |
29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Cox |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Fenwick |
15 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - peter danielian |
17 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allison Shorten |
26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Goodall |
4 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Cox |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Cox |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
12 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-11-72 |
You can find further information about peer review here.