Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - enrico lopriore |
29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Derks |
15 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - enrico lopriore |
5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Derks |
29 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
10 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
10 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
17 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Seiichi Morokuma |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
17 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
22 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-11-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.