Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - MAMAN DOGBA |
27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Faxelid |
24 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lale Say |
14 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Faxelid |
21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lale Say |
27 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
27 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
12 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angelo Nyamtema |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
12 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
17 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-11-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.