Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 May 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reija Klemetti |
30 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - zelee hill |
22 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Winch |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reija Klemetti |
23 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - zelee hill |
1 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Winch |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Winch |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
28 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Winch |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
3 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Winch |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-10-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.