Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improved pregnancy outcome in refugees and migrants despite low literacy on the Thai-Burmese border: results of three cross-sectional surveys

  • Verena I Carrara1Email author,
  • Celia Hogan1,
  • Cecilia De Pree1,
  • Francois Nosten1, 2, 3 and
  • Rose McGready1, 2, 3
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201111:45

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-45

Received: 20 November 2010

Accepted: 17 June 2011

Published: 17 June 2011

Abstract

Background

Maternal and infant health has been associated with maternal education level, which is highly associated with literacy. We aimed at estimating literacy rates among reproductive age women attending antenatal clinics in camps for refugees and in migrant clinics in Tak province, north-western Thailand, to determine whether illiteracy had an impact on birth outcomes.

Methods

Three reading assessments were conducted using an identical method each time, in 1995-97, 2003 and 2008. Midwives chose at random one of four pre-set sentences. Each woman was asked to read aloud and scoring was based on a "pass/fail" system. Pregnancy outcomes were compared with maternal literacy rate.

Results

Overall, 47% (1149/2424) of women were able to read. A significant improvement was observed among migrant (34% in 2003 vs. 46% in 2008, p = 0.01), but not refugee (47% in 1995-97, 49% in 2003, and 51% in 2008) women. Literate women were significantly more likely to be of non-Karen ethnicity, primigravidae, non-smokers, to remain free from malaria during pregnancy and to deliver in a health clinic. Significant improvements in pregnancy outcome (reductions in premature births, low birth weight newborns and neonatal death) between 1995-97 and 2003 were unrelated to literacy.

Conclusions

Significant reductions in poor pregnancy outcome over time have not been driven by changes in literacy rates, which have remained low. Access to early diagnosis and treatment of malaria in this population, and delivery with skilled birth attendants, despite ongoing low literacy, appears to have played a significant role.

Background

Low literacy skills have implications for health, whether in comprehending written instructions for taking medicines [1] or ability to understand one's medical condition [2]. Maternal and infant health has been associated with parental education levels, which can in part be measured by female literacy [35]. Maternal education level influences use of health services in Africa [6, 7], Latin America [8], and Asia [9]. Studies have demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes [10, 11], reduced neonatal and infant mortality [1215], and changes in reproductive health perception [16], with increasing levels of maternal education. Adult literacy programs have also demonstrated a reduction in infant mortality [17], and improvement in health-related knowledge [18]. In areas where a majority of women are illiterate or where schooling is poor or interrupted, innovative methods to deliver health messages and improve pregnancy outcomes need to be developed, as demonstrated recently in Nepal [19].

The latest World Health Organization estimate of maternal mortality for Burma was over 250/100,000 live-births; infant mortality was 50/1,000 live-births, of which, two-thirds occurred in rural areas, and less than half of pregnant women delivered with a skilled attendant [20]. The reported nationwide Burmese adult female literacy rate is high (89%) [21]. However, it fails to take into account geographical and ethnic differences. Ethno-linguistic minority native languages are not the language of education, nor are their scripts in the same alphabet, and there are over 100 different languages spoken in Burma [22]. Speakers of minority languages mostly live in rural areas where maternal and infant mortality are high.

On the eastern border of Burma prolonged armed conflict and economic difficulties have resulted in an influx of people to Thailand. This has contributed to the disruption of education in refugees and in migrants [23]. Children of migrant workers do not always have easy access to schooling or may drop out of school to help support the family; people arriving in the refugee camps, however, have the opportunity to enrol in an educational curriculum supported by non-governmental organizations [24]. Educational support and health care have been in place since the camps were established in the 1980s, and changes in health behaviour and improvements in education levels, in particular among the younger population, can be expected. In this manuscript we report literacy rates in pregnant women and explore the role of literacy in relation to poor pregnancy outcome on the Thai-Burmese border.

Methods

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the literacy rates of adult pregnant women attending antenatal care consultations in clinics for migrant populations, or in camps for displaced persons, and determine whether literacy had an impact on poor pregnancy outcome.

Study area and survey participants

The ethno-linguistic origins of the population living along the Thai-Burmese border are diverse; the largest ethnic group, on both sides of the north-western border, is Sgaw Karen. Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) provides free antenatal clinics (ANC) to camp and migrant populations. The camp population are families who fled armed conflict in Burma and settled in camps inside Thailand. The migrant population is composed of individuals and their families who are in search of work, often moving back and forth along the border (Figure 1). Minimum accepted age for marriage among the Karen community is 16 years; and although approximately 20% of pregnant women are teenagers, pregnancies occurring in the early teens are exceptional. Environment and living conditions have hardly changed over the years [25]; both refugee and migrant worker populations are from similarly deprived socio-economic backgrounds, although the population living in camps receives food and free access to medical care.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-11-45/MediaObjects/12884_2010_Article_404_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Location of the different ANC clinics where literacy surveys among pregnant women were conducted during the 3 survey-periods, in the Thai province of Tak bordering Burma. Location of SMRU clinics for camp population is represented by a triangle, location of clinics for migrant population by a square; Mae Sot is the main town of the Thai province of Tak bordering Burma

SMRU clinics are staffed by local health-workers. First antenatal consultation includes an obstetric and medical history and a detailed clinical examination for all women. Active antenatal screening for malaria and anaemia at antenatal clinics has been routine since 1986, because in this area transmission of malaria is low and seasonal but deleterious to pregnant women [26]. Women are encouraged to deliver with trained midwives in SMRU clinics where their newborn is weighed and examined.

Eligibility for participation

Any woman attending ANC consultation (which is voluntary) during the period of the cross-sectional survey was eligible to participate.

Enrolment criteria

There were no exclusion criteria, participation was voluntary and refusal to participate did not impact on the continuum of antenatal care. The first literacy assessment was part of a "malaria in pregnancy prevention" trial and was conducted at enrolment (April 1995-September 1997) [27]. The next two literacy assessments (October 2003 and April 2008) were part of planning IEC (Information, Education and Communication) materials on prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission programs.

Literacy assessment

Reading fluency is part of conceptual models developed to assess an individual's ability to comprehend messages or printed information [28]. Self-reported information on reading ability is subjective and often unreliable; education level attained does not always correlate with literacy skills and there are no standardized tests for assessing adult literacy in this multi-lingual setting [29]. We estimated women's literacy by their ability to read aloud a short sentence composed of words commonly used in local health messages. A 5-7 word health message sentence was typed in large font onto an A4 page mounted onto cardboard in three different languages: English, Burmese and Sgaw Karen. English was selected because it is taught in the camps and used by non-governmental teaching agencies supporting migrant communities. Cards were selected at random and the woman chose the language herself. The scoring was based on a "pass/fail" system: only women who could read aloud and fluently the complete sentence were reported as "can read". Women who read one language were asked if they could read another language and another card was taken at random and the exercise repeated. All three languages were scored individually. Women who mentioned their reading knowledge of a language not proposed on the cards were not tested formally, but were nonetheless scored as "can read another language". Fluency of reading was assessed by midwives able to speak, read and write in all three languages. During the 2008 survey, pregnant women were asked how many years they had attended school. If they said that they could read but had not attended school they were asked who taught them. Assessment was conducted face-to-face in a private area of the ANC.

Pregnancy outcomes

Pregnancy outcomes were reported as miscarriage (pregnancy ending before 28 weeks of gestation), stillbirth, live-birth, or lost to follow up. Loss to follow-up was defined as discontinuation of antenatal care before the outcome of pregnancy was known (which occurs in this area due to population movement). Prematurity was defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. Birth weight was valid if measured within the three first days of life, and low birth weight (LBW) was defined as a weight below 2500 g. Perinatal deaths included stillbirths and deaths of live born infants occurring within the first week of life, while neonatal deaths were deaths of live born infants occurring within 28 days of age. Gestational age was estimated by ultrasound at first consultation [30], by last menstrual period if known, or by Dubowitz gestational assessment scored between 6 and 72 hours after birth [31]. All congenital malformations were recorded. Minor malformations (i.e. skin tag) were reported as normal unless they were associated with another abnormality.

Ethics statement

Entering and following ANC was voluntary, as was participation in the literacy assessments. The 1995-97 assessment was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine of Mahidol University, the Central Scientific Ethical Committee of Denmark and the Karen Refugee Committee [27]. Verbal consent was obtained during the next two assessments (2003 and 2008) as reading did not involve any risk for the pregnant woman.

Pregnancy records have been entered into an electronic data recording system since 1987. Ethical approval for retrospective analysis of pregnancy records was given by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC 28-09).

Statistical Analysis

Data collected during the reading assessments were computerized separately (double-entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet), and linked to the core ANC database by the patient unique ID code number. Only variables necessary for the present analysis were selected. Data were analysed using SPSS for Windows™ (Version 14, SPSS Inc.). Continuous normally distributed data were described by their mean ± SD (i.e. age, estimated gestational age, birthweight), non-normally distributed data by their median and range (i.e. gravidity, parity). Percentages were given for categorical data, which were compared using the Chi-square test with Yates' continuity correction or Fisher's exact test. A paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compare continuous variables. Factors associated with two variables, "ability to read" and "having a newborn of low birth weight", were evaluated by univariate analysis; two logistic regression models were created using "ability to read (yes/no)" and "LBW (yes/no)" as dependant variables. All factors with a p < 0.10 in univariate analysis were entered in their respective stepwise logistic regression model, and were included in the relevant tables. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were given with their 95% confidence interval.

Results

A total of 2424 pregnant women agreed to be interviewed; 1965 were living in camps and 459 were from the migrant population.

Demographic characteristics

Populations were similar in age, gravidity, and parity at each survey (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of pregnant women living in camp and in migrant populations, by survey-period

 

1995-97

2003

2008

Camp population

(N= 743)

(N= 547)

(N= 675)

Age (year)1

25 ± 6 [15-44]

26 ± 7 [14-44]

26 ± 6 [15-48]

- Teenagers2

21% (157)

17% (95)

13% (86)

- 20-29 years2

53% (396)

50% (275)

56% (381)

- ≥ 30 years2

26% (190)

33% (177)

31% (208)

Primigravida2

27% (198)

22% (119)

26% (178)

Gravidity3

3 [1-14]

3 [1-11]

3 [1-17]

Parity3

1 [0-11]

2 [0-9]

1 [0-10]

Karen ethnicity2

85% (365)

88% (81)

81% (548)

Smokers2

41% (307)

30% (166)

21% (143)

Malaria in pregnancy2

25% (187)

7% (37)

7% (44)

Anaemia in pregnancy (Hct < 30%)2

71% (523)

61% (335)

28% (188)

Migrant population

 

( N = 163)

( N = 296)

Age (year)1

 

25 ± 7 [13-43]

27 ± 7 [15-46]

- Teenagers2

 

21% (34)

16% (46)

- 20-29 years2

 

50% (82)

55% (164)

- ≥ 30 years2

 

29% (47)

29% (86)

Primigravida2

 

28% (46)

28% (83)

Gravidity3

 

3 [1-12]

3 [1-12]

Parity3

 

1 [0-10]

1 [0-8]

Karen ethnicity2

 

70% (14)

64% (189)

Smokers2

 

35% (56)

26% (76)

Malaria in pregnancy2

 

50% (81)

37% (110)

Anaemia in pregnancy (Hct < 30%)2

 

57% (93)

47% (138)

Data are presented as mean ± SD [range] 1, as percentage (number) 2, or as median [range] 3

Over the span of 14 years there was a significant reduction of teenage pregnancies, women smoking, and having malaria or anaemia during pregnancy in the camp population. The same trends were observed in the migrant population, but were only significant for malaria and anaemia.

Literacy assessment

Overall, 47% of pregnant women were able to read at least one language (n = 1149). Of those women who could read, 68% (n = 786) read one language, 24% (n = 278) read two, and 7% (n = 85) three or more. An equal number of women read Burmese or Sgaw Karen; however, Burmese was more likely to be read by the migrant population (86% (n = 165/192) vs. 60% (n = 577/957); p < 0.001), whilst Sgaw Karen was more frequently read by the camp population (71% (n = 676) vs. 19% (n = 37); p < 0.001). English was read by 8% (n = 91/1149) of the women with no significant difference between refugees and migrants. The ability to read another language was acknowledged by only 5.2% (n = 60) of women (17 reported reading Thai, 39 Poe Karen and 4 Arabic).

Reading rate rose significantly among the migrant population, from 34% (n = 55) in 2003 to 46% (n = 137) in 2008, (p = 0.01), but not in the pregnant women living in the camps (47% (n = 350) in 1995-97, 49% (n = 266) in 2003 and 51% (n = 341) in 2008; p = 0.44). In 2008, the proportion of pregnant women able to read at least one language was identical in both populations. The small increase in proportion of teenage pregnant women able to read at least one language in either population was not significant (Figures 2 and 3). Reading two or more languages was more frequent among women living in the camps (35% (n = 335) vs. 15% (n = 29) in the migrants; p < 0.001). In the 2008 interviews, the majority of women living in the camp who reported having attended school did so while still living in Burma or in Thai villages (56%, n = 193).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-11-45/MediaObjects/12884_2010_Article_404_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Pregnant women attending ANC in the camps able to read (presented as percentage of total pregnant women assessed), by age-group and survey-period.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-11-45/MediaObjects/12884_2010_Article_404_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Pregnant women attending ANC in the clinics for migrant population (presented as percentage of total pregnant women assessed) able to read, by age-group and survey-period

Pregnant women's demographic characteristics, habits or medical conditions that could potentially be associated with literacy were evaluated in univariate analysis and all of these are presented in table 2. All were significantly associated with literacy and were included in the regression model. After adjustment, three major health behaviour habits remained associated with the ability to read: less likely to smoke, less malaria during pregnancy and more likely to deliver in a health facility (Table 2).
Table 2

Maternal characteristics, habits and health risks associated with the ability to read (dependent variable) among pregnant women from migrant and camp populations (all 3 surveys combined, n = 2424)

Variables examined:

N

Ability to read

% can read (n)

OR [95%CI]

AOR [95%CI]

< 30 yrs

1716

51% (876)

0.6 [0.5-0.7]

0.3 [0.2-0.4]

≥ 30 yrs

708

39% (273)

1.0

1.0

Primigravid

624

60% (374)

0.5 [0.4-0.6]

0.6 [0.5-0.8]

Multigravid

1800

43% (775)

1.0

1.0

Non-Karen

315

64% (200)

0.5 [0.4-0.6]

0.7 [0.5-0.8]

Karen

1197

45% (542)

1.0

1.0

Living in camp

1965

49% (957)

0.8 [0.6-0.9]

NS

Migrant workers

459

42% (192)

1.0

 

Non-Smoking

1675

58% (966)

0.2 [0.1-0.3]

0.3 [0.2-0.4]

Smoking

748

24% (182)

1.0

1.0

No Malaria

1965

50% (975)

0.6 [0.5-0.8]

0.7 [0.5-0.9]

Malaria (+)

459

38% (174)

1.0

1.0

No Anaemia

1142

51% (583)

0.8 [0.6-0.9]

NS

Anaemia (+)

1277

44% (563)

1.0

 

Clinic delivery

1228

53% (652)

0.6 [0.5-0.7]

0.5 [0.4-0.7]

Home delivery

1029

40% (414)

1.0

1.0

In bold, OR and AOR with a p < 0.05; all variables with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered in the logistic regression model to obtain the AOR.

Pregnancy outcomes

During the 1995-97 survey, most women delivered at home (80%). In 2003 and 2008 these proportions were inverted as 70% (n = 1090) of deliveries occurred in SMRU clinics. Outcomes were known for 93% (n = 2258) of pregnancies. There were 44 miscarriages and 26 stillbirths, 2% and 1% of pregnancy outcomes, respectively; these proportions were similar between the study-periods and the population groups. Twenty eight neonatal deaths were reported, 11 in 1995-97, 7 in 2003 and 10 in 2008, giving neonatal mortality rates of 16.1, 11.0 and 11.5 deaths per 1000 live births, respectively (p = 0.65). Risk of stillbirth, miscarriage, or neonatal death did not differ significantly between literate and illiterate women.

Characteristics of 2188 live newborns are presented in Table 3. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of premature birth and of LBW (p < 0.001 for both) in the camp population. In 2003 and 2008 the mean birth weight and proportion of LBW in both population groups were not significantly different.
Table 3

Birth outcomes, by population group and survey-period

 

1995-97

2003

2008

Camp population

   

Known live births

(n = 681)

(n = 515)

(n = 621)

EGA (wks, days)1

38.4 ± 1.8 [28.0-43.0]

39.0 ± 1.6 [28.5-42.5]

39.1 ± 1.5 [28.0-42.1]

Premature births

13% (87)

7% (35)

6% (35)

Male offspring

55% (371)

55% (282)

49% (303)

Live births weighed in3 days of life

(n = 662)

(n = 498)

(n = 610)

Birth weight (g)1

2848 ± 504 [1007-4900]

2980 ± 443 [800-4500]

2968 ± 431 [1100-4220]

Low birth weight

18% (118)

11% (56)

11% (65)

Term LBW

10% (58)

9% (40)

8% (43)

Migrant population

   

Known live births

 

(n = 124)

(n = 247)

EGA (wks, days)1

 

39.6 ± 2.0 [30.1-43.0]

39.0 ± 1.8 [28.6-43.4]

Premature births

 

7% (8)

8% (19)

Male offspring

 

55% (68)

53% (130)

Live births weighed in3 days of life

 

(n = 56)

(n = 155)

Birth weight (g)1

 

2870 ± 466 [1050-4000]

2952 ± 492 [1250-4600]

Low birth weight

 

13% (7)

12% (18)

Term LBW

 

8% (4)

8% (11)

Data are presented as percentage (number) or as mean ± SD [range] 1

Maternal and newborn factors possibly associated with the risk of LBW are presented in table 4. Four maternal and two newborn factors were significantly associated with LBW and were entered into the regression model. Abnormal newborn, maternal malaria and place of delivery were also included in the model (p > 0.05 and < 0.1). After controlling for confounding factors, there was no association between literacy and the risk of LBW (Table 4).
Table 4

Maternal and newborn factors associated with low birth weight (LBW) (dependent variable) in newborns weighed within 3 days of birth (all 3 surveys combined, n = 1981)

Variables examined

N

Low Birth Weight

OR [95%CI]

AOR [95%CI]

Maternal factors

 

% LBW (n)

  

Teenager

341

21% (70)

1.9 [1.4-2.6]

NS

Older

1640

12% (194)

1.0

 

Primigravid

501

19% (97)

1.9 [1.4-2.5]

1.9 [1.3-2.6]

Multigravid

1480

11% (167)

1.0

1.0

Karen

1050

14% (144)

1.1[0.7-1.7]

NS

Non-Karen

252

12% (31)

1.0

 

Migrant workers

211

12% (25)

0.9 [0.6-1.3]

NS

Living in camps

1770

14% (239)

1.0

 

Illiterate

1010

15% (153)

1.4 [1.1-1.8]

NS

Literate

971

11% (111)

1.0

 

Reading 1 language

321

11% (74)

1.0 [0.7-1.5]

NS

Reading >1 language

650

12% (37)

1.0

 

Smoking

594

18% (107)

1.7 [1.3-2.3]

1.9 [1.4-2.7]

Non-Smoking

1387

11% (157)

1.0

1.0

Malaria (+)

318

17% (53)

1.4 [1.0-1.9]

NS

No Malaria

1663

13% (211)

1.0

 

Anaemia (+)

1076

13% (144)

1.0 [0.8-1.3]

NS

No Anaemia

901

13% (120)

1.0

 

Home delivery

839

15% (128)

1.3 [1.0-1.7]

NS

Clinic delivery

1142

12% (136)

1.0

 

Newborn factors

    

Prematurity

163

66% (108)

20.9 [14.5-30.1]

20.3 [14.0-29.6]

Term birth

1818

9% (156)

1.0

1.0

Female offspring

941

16% (148)

1.5 [1.1-1.9]

1.8 [1.3-2.4]

Male offspring

1040

11% (116)

1.0

1.0

Abnormal

30

27% (8)

2.4 [1.0-5.5]

NS

Normal

1951

13% (256)

1.0

 

In bold, OR and AOR with p < 0.05, in italic with p ≥ 0.05 and < 0.1; all variables with p < 0.1 were entered in the logistic regression model to obtain the AOR

Discussion

The literacy rate remains low amongst pregnant women in refugee camps or attending migrant ANC clinics on the Thai-Burmese border. Literacy rates have not improved amongst pregnant refugees despite non-governmental organisations supporting camp-based schools for the past 25 years, a finding already reported by Oh et al. [32]. These reported literacy rates are very similar to self-reported literacy in pregnant women in Eastern Burma [33]. However, some positive changes in birth outcomes have occurred in the almost 10-year period between the first (1995-97) and the second survey (2003), with a decrease in the proportion of premature births, LBW and a 40% reduction in neonatal mortality.

In this population illiteracy was not associated with any poor pregnancy outcomes. This does not preclude an indirect impact via a reduction over time in malaria in pregnancy (3 1/2 fold) and smoking (2 fold) and an increase in delivery with skilled birth attendants (2 1/2 fold). These three factors were associated with literacy in this population and all of them have been associated with birth outcomes previously [3436]. The data here imply that the importance of illiteracy to poor pregnancy outcomes is relative to the severity of other contributing factors within a population. Access to early diagnosis and treatment of malaria in this population [37, 38] and delivery with skilled birth attendants, despite ongoing low literacy, appears to have played a significant role. Similar findings have been described by Mullany et al. in Eastern Burma [33].

There were several limitations to this study. No measure of socio-economic status (SES) was included at each survey and improved SES may help explain the better outcomes. However, SMRU is an operational field based research unit and has not observed major changes in general living conditions, rations or health provision to these populations in over 20 years. The choice of literacy assessment was not ideal. Formal [39, 40] and informal [41] assessments of adult literacy have been used to evaluate patients' health literacy for the past 20 years, although most have been validated in the most commonly used languages (i.e. English or Spanish). Few attempts have been made to develop simple instruments for literacy screening in Asian countries [42]. Our choice of using a 5-7 word sentence made-up of words used in health education messages was based on discussions with local health staff and with patients and the implications of being unable to read them, obvious to local health staff; as well as being easy and quick to perform given the time constraints of busy antenatal care consultations. Literacy and education level depend on ethnic origin and where people originate from in Burma; this information, particularly among migrant workers, was not systematically obtained. And whether this low literacy rate is a gender issue [43] or a neglected population issue remains uncertain as there has not been a comparison of male and female literacy in this population.

On a practical level, half of the pregnant population attending ANC is still unable to read and/or has had no formal education. Of those who can read, most read one of two languages (Burmese and Sgaw Karen). This has serious implications for any community-based interventions aimed at improving maternal and child health, the development and use of IEC health materials, explaining instructions on vitamins and medication and for obtaining informed consent [44]. Furthermore, many refugee women and their families will eventually resettle in foreign countries and their poor literacy skills may have consequences for their physical health and overall well being [4547].

Conclusions

The modest 12.5% and 1.9% reduction in illiteracy amongst reproductive age migrant and refugee women on the Thai Burmese border from 2003 to 2008 falls short of the goal set by the World Education Forum in Dakar in 2000, to reduce adult illiteracy by half by 2015. This study does not question the benefits of maternal literacy on pregnancy outcomes [1015]. On the contrary, significant improvements in pregnancy outcome are possible without detectable improvements in female literacy. Health programmes must continue to address health needs in terms of access, acceptability and effectiveness.

Abbreviations

ANC: 

antenatal clinic.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the pregnant women who voluntarily participated to these surveys, and the SMRU midwifery and computer department staff for their dedicated work. We also would like to thank Steve Lindsay for stimulating the original survey.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit
(2)
Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine Churchill Hospital
(3)
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University

References

  1. Davis TC, Wolf MS, Bass PF, Thompson JA, Tilson HH, Neuberger M, Parker RM: Literacy and misunderstanding prescription drug labels. Ann Intern Med. 2006, 145 (12): 887-894.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Williams MV, Davis T, Parker RM, Weiss BD: The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. Fam Med. 2002, 34 (5): 383-389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cochrane SH: Fertility and Education; what do we really know?. 1979, Baltimore: Published for the World Bank [by] Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Ross CE, Wu CL: The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev. 1995, 27: 719-745.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Furnee CA, Groot W, van den Brink HM: The health effects of education: a meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2008, 18 (4): 417-421. 10.1093/eurpub/ckn028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ikeako LC, Onah HE, Iloabachie GC: Influence of formal maternal education on the use of maternity services in Enugu, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006, 26 (1): 30-34. 10.1080/01443610500364004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Okafor CB: Availability and use of services for maternal and child health care in rural Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991, 34 (4): 331-346. 10.1016/0020-7292(91)90602-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore D, Castillo E, Richardson C, Reid RJ: Determinants of health status and the influence of primary health care services in Latin America, 1990-98. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003, 18 (4): 279-292. 10.1002/hpm.731.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gokhale MK, Rao SS, Garole VR: Infant mortality in India: use of maternal and child health services in relation to literacy status. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002, 20 (2): 138-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sirivong A, Silphong B, Simphaly N, Phayasane T, Bonouvong V, Schelp FP: Advantages of trained TBA and the perception of females and their experiences with reproductive health in two districts of the Luangprabang Province, Lao PDR. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003, 34 (4): 919-928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van den Broek NR, White SA, Ntonya C, Ngwale M, Cullinan TR, Molyneux ME, Neilson JP: Reproductive health in rural Malawi: a population-based survey. BJOG. 2003, 110 (10): 902-908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chowdhury AK: Education and infant survival in rural Bangladesh. Health Policy Educ. 1982, 2 (3-4): 369-374. 10.1016/0165-2281(82)90017-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell J, McDonald P: Influence of maternal education on infant and child mortality: levels and causes. Health Policy Educ. 1982, 2 (3-4): 251-267. 10.1016/0165-2281(82)90012-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rajna PN, Mishra AK, Krishnamoorthy S: Impact of maternal education and health services on child mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India. Asia Pac Popul J. 1998, 13 (2): 27-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cleland JG, Van Ginneken JK: Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: the search for pathways of influence. Soc Sci Med. 1988, 27 (12): 1357-1368. 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90201-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Adhikari R: Demographic, socio-economic, and cultural factors affecting fertility differentials in Nepal. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010, 10 (1): 19-10.1186/1471-2393-10-19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandiford P, Cassel J, Sanchez G, Coldham C: Does intelligence account for the link between maternal literacy and child survival?. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45 (8): 1231-1239. 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00042-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith CA: Women's acquisition of literacy skills and health knowledge in Nepal: A comparative study of nonformal education approaches. Electronic Doctoral Dissertation. 1997, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts - AmherstGoogle Scholar
  19. Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, Mesko N, Morrison J, Tumbahangphe KM, Tamang S, Thapa S, Shrestha D, Thapa B, Shrestha JR, Wade A, Borghi J, Standing H, Manandhar M, Costello AM: Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9438): 970-979. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17021-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Improving Maternal newborn and child health-Myanmar. [http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Improving_maternal_newborn_and_child_health_myanmar.pdf]
  21. Myanmar: general profile. [http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/document.aspx?ReportId=124&IF_Language=eng&BR_Country=1040&BR_Region=40515]
  22. Gordon RG: Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 2005, Dallas, Texas: SIL International, FifteenthGoogle Scholar
  23. IOM: Situation Report on International Migration in East and South-East Asia. Situation Report on International Migration in East and South-East Asia. 2008, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  24. Oh SA, Ochalumthan O, Pla-Law-La S, Htoo J: Education Survey Report 2005. 2006, Thailand: ZOA Refugee Care, 168-Google Scholar
  25. Boel M, Carrara VI, Rijken M, Proux S, Nacher M, Pimanpanarak M, Paw MK, Moo O, Gay H, Bailey W, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Nosten F, McGready R: Complex Interactions between soil-transmitted helminths and malaria in pregnant women on the Thai-Burmese border. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (11): e887-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000887.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Nosten F, ter Kuile F, Maelankirri L, Decludt B, White NJ: Malaria during pregnancy in an area of unstable endemicity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 85 (4): 424-429. 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90205-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McGready R, Hamilton KA, Simpson JA, Cho T, Luxemburger C, Edwards R, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F, Lindsay SW: Safety of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) in pregnancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65 (4): 285-289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Baker DW: The meaning and the measure of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2006, 21 (8): 878-883. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00540.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD: Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ Behav. 1998, 25 (5): 613-624. 10.1177/109019819802500508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rijken MJ, Lee SJ, Boel ME, Papageorghiou AT, Visser GH, Dwell SL, Kennedy SH, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Nosten F, McGready R: Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 34 (4): 395-403. 10.1002/uog.7350.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V: Gestational age of the newborn: a clinical manual. 1977, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Oh SA, Ochalumthan O, Pla-Law-La S, Htoo J: Education Survey Report 2005. ZOA Refugee Care. 2006, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  33. Mullany LC, Lee TJ, Yone L, Lee CI, Teela KC, Paw P, Shwe Oo EK, Maung C, Kuiper H, Masenior NF, Beyrer C: Impact of community-based maternal health workers on coverage of essential maternal health interventions among internally displaced communities in Eastern Burma: the MOM project. PLoS Med. 2010, 7 (8): e1000317-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000317.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Luxemburger C, McGready R, Kham A, Morison L, Cho T, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, White NJ, Nosten F: Effects of malaria during pregnancy on infant mortality in an area of low malaria transmission. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 154 (5): 459-465. 10.1093/aje/154.5.459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nosten F, McGready R, Simpson JA, Thwai KL, Balkan S, Cho T, Hkirijaroen L, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Effects of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy. Lancet. 1999, 354 (9178): 546-549. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09247-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Phung H, Bauman A, Nguyen TV, Young L, Tran M, Hillman K: Risk factors for low birth weight in a socio-economically disadvantaged population: parity, marital status, ethnicity and cigarette smoking. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003, 18 (3): 235-243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, Luxemburger C, Thway KL, Brockman A, McGready R, ter Kuile F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000, 356 (9226): 297-302. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02505-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Carrara VI, Sirilak S, Thonglairuam J, Rojanawatsirivet C, Proux S, Gilbos V, Brockman A, Ashley EA, McGready R, Krudsood S, Leemingsawat S, Looareesuwan S, Singhasivanon P, White N, Nosten F: Deployment of early diagnosis and mefloquine-artesunate treatment of falciparum malaria in Thailand: the Tak Malaria Initiative. PLoS Med. 2006, 3 (6): e183-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, Jackson RH, Bates P, George RB, Bairnsfather LE: Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991, 23 (6): 433-435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR: The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995, 10 (10): 537-541. 10.1007/BF02640361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Plimpton S, Root J: Materials and strategies that work in low literacy health communication. Public Health Rep. 1994, 109 (1): 86-92.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Han HR, Kim J, Kim MT, Kim KB: Measuring Health Literacy Among Immigrants with a Phonetic Primary Language: A Case of Korean American Women. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010Google Scholar
  43. Gender equity is the key to maternal and child health. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9730): 1939-10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60905-1.
  44. Cheah PY, Lwin KM, Phaiphun L, Maelankiri L, Parker M, Day NP, White NJ, Nosten F: Community engagement on the Thai-Burmese border: rationale, experience and lessons learnt. International Health. 2010, 2: 123-129. 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.02.001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Bircher H: Prenatal care disparities and the migrant farm worker community. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2009, 34 (5): 303-307. 10.1097/01.NMC.0000360423.14110.96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller PW, Neo LM: Immigrant unemployment: the Australian experience. Int Migr. 1997, 35 (2): 155-185. 10.1111/1468-2435.00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schoeni RF: Labor market outcomes of immigrant women in the United States: 1970 to 1990. Int Migr Rev. 1998, 32 (1): 57-77. 10.2307/2547560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/45/prepub

Copyright

© Carrara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.