Skip to main content

Vaginal candidiasis prevalence, associated factors, and antifungal susceptibility patterns among pregnant women attending antenatal care at bule hora university teaching hospital, Southern Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Vulvovaginitis is common in women of reproductive age group characterized by purulent white discharge. The incidence of vulvovaginitis has risen recently due to the resistance of Candida species to commonly used antifungal agents and recurrent infections.

Objective

The study aimed to determine the prevalence, associated factors, and antifungal susceptibility patterns of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women attending Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2023 to August 2023. Using systematic random sampling, 317 pregnant women participated in the study. Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and Chromogenic Candida Differential Agar were used to isolate and identify Candida species from clinical samples. Antifungal susceptibility was performed using a modified disc diffusion method. Epi data version 4.6 was used for data entry and Statistical Packages for Social Sciences version 25 was used for statistical analysis. A P-value < 0.05 was declared statistically significant.

Result

The prevalence of vaginal candidiasis was 26.8% (95%, CI 21.9–31.72%). History of using contraceptives (AOR = 5.03, 95%CI, 1.21–11.37), past vaginal candidiasis (AOR = 6, 95%CI, 1.61–12.92), pregnant women infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (AOR = 4.24, 95%CI, 1.23–14.14), diabetic mellitus (AOR = 2.17, 95%CI, 1.02–4.64), history of antibiotic use (AOR = 3.55, 95%CI, 1.67–12.75), pregnant women in third trimester (AOR = 8.72, 95%CI, 1.30–23.07), were the significantly associated factors for vaginal candidiasis. The study revealed that itraconazole, amphotericin B, and miconazole were the most effective antifungal drugs for all Candida isolates.

Conclusion

The present study has identified a high prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women. The isolated Candida species showed resistance to fluconazole, ketoconazole, and clotrimazole. Therefore, healthcare providers should increase awareness of the risks of Candida infections to reduce Candida species among pregnant women. Physicians should prescribe suitable medications based on antifungal drug test outcomes to treat pregnant women with vaginal candidiasis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The second most common vaginal infection affecting women of reproductive age is vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), which mainly causes inflammation of the vulva and vagina [1]. Worldwide, nearly 5–10 million females seek gynecologic advice for vaginitis every year [2]. Women of childbearing age estimate that approximately 70–75% will have at least one episode of VVC during their lifetime, and 40–50% will suffer recurrence [3]. Recurrent VVC worldwide affects approximately 138 million women annually, ranging from 103 to 172 million, with an annual prevalence of 3871 per 100,000 women worldwide; 372 million women are affected by recurrent VVC over their lifetime [4].

VVC is an infection of the estrogenic vagina and vestibulum, which can extend to the outside of the labia minora, labia majora, and the intercrural region [5]. It is most often by the overabundance of an opportunistic pathogenic yeast, Candida albicans (approximately 90%), which is a common member of the vaginal flora [6]. Vulvovaginal candidiasis is caused by Candida albicans in almost 80–90% of cases, except that only a minority of cases (10–20%) are caused by non - C. albicans species, usually Candida glabrata [7]. This dimorphic yeast, a commensal that colonizes the skin and gastrointestinal and reproductive tracts, can be found in the vaginal tracts of 20 to 30% of healthy asymptomatic women at any single point in time. If the balance between the colonizing yeast and the host is temporarily altered, then Candida can cause infections such as VVC, associated with clinical signs of inflammation [8].

During pregnancy, VVC is considered more common and difficult to eradicate because of several normal physiological changes such as hormone changes, vaginal pH, and alteration of microflora due to pathogens in the genitourinary tract that favor the growth of Candida spp [9]. In vulvovaginal candidiasis, three out of four women had an infection in their lifetime [10]. Candida albicans are part of the mucosal flora in many individuals, typically existing as a benign member of the human microbiome for extended periods. However, it can cause superficial infections due to hormonal effects that inhibit anti-Candida activities, inadequate hygiene, and compromised immunity. These infections may then develop into severe, life-threatening systemic conditions. Ultimately, this fungal pathogen has the potential to colonize various regions of the body [11, 12].

Pathogenic Candida spp have been identified, including the ability to adhere and invade host cells, the secretion of enzyme hydrolases, and biofilm formation [13]. Candida albicans has been reported to be resistant to many antifungal drugs and is usually treated with the azole class of antifungal drugs due to their lower toxicity and availability [14, 15]. Vulvovaginal candidiasis is a global concern because of its economic importance and sexually transmitted infection [16]. The mechanisms used by Candida spp. to produce vaginal inflammation are not known [17]. Diabetes mellitus is a predisposing factor during pregnancy [18]. Other factors include the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, high doses of estrogen, and oral contraceptives [19].

During the past several decades, numerous studies have focused on improving standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) serves as a reference method for yeast susceptibility testing. Agar-based susceptibility testing, particularly the classical disk diffusion method, has garnered significant interest among researchers [20]. Antifungal susceptibility tests that correlate with clinical outcomes may forecast treatment failures and contribute to the creation of local antibiograms, aiding in the empirical selection of antifungal agents [21]. Resistance to antifungal drugs, especially in patients previously treated with azole antifungals, poses a significant public health challenge [22].

The community knowledge and evidence on vaginal candidiasis prevalence and associated factors among pregnant women in the study area are limited to access; therefore, the present study will provide important input on the prevalence and associated factors of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant mothers attending antenatal care and help to advance possible recommendations.

Method and materials

Study area and period

This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital from May to August 2023. The hospital is located in Bule Hora town and is one of the towns of the Oromia Regional state in the southern part of Ethiopia. Bule Hora is the capital of the West Guji zone located 467 km from Addis Ababa in the south and is a teaching hospital that provides health services to more than 1.5 million inhabitants in the zone. The hospital’s antenatal care (ANC) clinic provides routine antenatal screening services for more than 20 pregnant women per day. This town is bordered on the south by the Borena zone, on the west by the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region, on the north by the Abaya River, which separates it from the SNNPR, and on the east by the Guji zone.

Study design and population

A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was used among pregnant women who attended antenatal care (ANC) at the Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital from May to August 2023. All pregnant women who were randomly selected and attended the antenatal care (ANC) during the data collection period, and met the selection criteria, were included in the study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All randomly selected pregnant women attending Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital ANC aged between 18 and 49 were included in the study, while the pregnant women who had either on/taken intra-vaginally or systemic antifungal therapy within the last 2 or 3 weeks were excluded.

Sample size determination

The sample size for this study was determined using the single population proportion formula. When the proportion of vaginal candidiasis (p = 25%) was taken from a previous study conducted at Debra Markos Referral Hospital [23], with the assumption of precision or degree of error 0.05, the confidence interval was 95% and the non-response rate was assumed to be 10%.

$$n = \frac{{{Z^2}\alpha /2P\left( {1 - p} \right)}}{{{d^2}}} = \frac{{1.9{6^2}\left( {1 - 0.25} \right)}}{{0.0{5^2}}} = 288.12 \approx 288$$

Adding 10% of the non-respondent rate, the final sample size was 317 pregnant women. Where n = Sample size, Z = value corresponding to 95% level of significance = 1.96, P = proportion of prevalence vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women = 25%, d = marginal error assumed to be 5%.

Sampling technique

Monthly estimated ANC attendant in the Bule Hora University teaching hospital, which was calculated from the antenatal care followers from registration. Then, the total sample size of pregnant women is proportional to their population size based on the previously registered ANC followers. Pregnant women attending ANC at the time of data collection were carefully chosen using a systematic random sampling method. To decide the interval (k), the estimated total number of attendants of ANC 1135 is divided into an allocated sample size of the study, that is, K = N/ n = 1,135/ 317 = 3.58 ≈ 4.

where, N = total ANC attendants, n = required sample size, K = sampling interval.

So, all fourth pregnant women attending ANC were included in the sample until the total sample size for this study was obtained in the hospital. Based on the client’s sequences, which were used as a sampling frame using systematic random sampling. The process was continued throughout data collection until the required sample size was achieved.

Data collection instruments and procedures

Three Medical laboratory technicians and two midwives were recruited for data collection. Training was provided for the data collector and supervisor. The sociodemographic information, clinical factors, and behavioral factors data were collected using structured questionnaires. The vaginal swab was collected from each participant using a sterile cotton swab moistened with physiological saline and then inserted and rotated gently to pick up the swab. In case an appropriate vaginal swab could not be obtained, alternatively, the participant was informed to collect a first voided urine sample through contamination control using a labeled screw-capped universal container [24].

Identification of candida species

Microscopy examination and culture procedures

The specimens were collected from each pregnant woman and immediately transported to the Bule Hora University Microbiology Laboratory. Smears were prepared from vaginal swabs or urine sediments, stained with Gram’s stain, and examined under a microscope using 10x and 40x objectives. The Gram stain revealed Gram-positive yeast-like budding cells, which were then cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) containing 2% chloramphenicol. The inoculated plate was incubated at 37 °C and examined after 24 h for cream-colored pastry colonies and budding yeast cells suggestive of Candida species. The SDA isolates were inoculated in Candida selective agar medium (Chromogenic Candida Differential Agar - TM 1977, New Delhi, India) using an inoculating needle and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h to ensure detection of mixed cultures by colon colors such as C. albicans (light green), C. tropicalis (blue to metallic blue), C. glabrata (cream to white), and C. krusie (purple-pink). The method is based on the differential release of chromogenic breakdown products from various substrates by Candida species after differential exoenzyme activity. It served as the presumptive identification of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. krusie [25].

Germ tube test (GTT)

A colony was transferred from the agar slant using a sterile wire loop and then inoculated into a germ tube test to determine the presence of germ tubes. A germ tube test was performed by mixing 3–4 colonies in 0.5 ml of human serum, incubated at 37 ° C for 2–4 h, and examined under a microscope using 10x and 40x objectives for germ tubes. The presence of Candida albicans was confirmed by observation of a short, slender, tube-shaped growth structure (pseudohyphae) [26, 27].

Antifungal susceptibility test

Antifungal susceptibility testing for all Candida isolates was performed using a modified disc diffusion method following the 2018 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The test was carried out by adding 2% glucose and 0.5 µg/mL methylene blue dye to Mueller-Hinton agar. The suspension, prepared with normal saline and four identical colonies, was incubated overnight on Mueller-Hinton agar and then compared to the 0.5 McFarland standard. A cotton swab soaked in the fungal suspension streaked the modified Mueller-Hinton medium. Antifungal discs, including amphotericin B 100 µg, clotrimazole 10 µg, fluconazole 10 µg, itraconazole 10 µg, miconazole, and ketoconazole 30 µg, were placed on the agar using a disc dispenser. The plates were then incubated at 37 ° C for 24 h. Subsequently, the inhibition zones (zone diameters) were measured and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines [28].

Operational definition

Risk behavior

refers to the frequent use of antibiotics and certain types of contraceptives, which can increase the risk of Candida infection [29].

Pregnancy-related factor

Refers to the gestational period, which means the time from the beginning of pregnancy to the birth time of the subject that exposed them to the risk of Candida infection [30].

Clinical factors

Refers to post-medical diseases such as chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, HIV, and previous episodes of candidiasis [31].

Data quality control

Data collectors received three days of training. The questionnaire was initially prepared in English, then translated into Afan Oromo, and subsequently retranslated into English to maintain the consistency of the questions. 5% of the questionnaires underwent pre-testing at the Bule Hora Health Center. Culture media were prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions, and sterility was confirmed by incubating 35% of the batch at 37 °C overnight to check for any microbial growth. Culture medium exhibited growth was discarded and replaced with a new sterile batch. The standard strain of C. albicans (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 10231)) was used for quality control.

Data processing and statistical analysis

Data was entered using EPi data version 4.6 and exported to the SPSS Version-25 Statistical Package for analysis. Descriptive statistics, numbers, frequency, percentages, tables, and odds ratio (OR) were used to describe the findings. In addition, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between dependent and independent variables. A P-value less than 0.25 at 95% CI during the bivariate analysis was further calculated using multivariate logistic regression to avoid the effect of confounding. Finally, a p-value < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

A total of 317 pregnant women were included in this study. The ages of the study participants ranged from 18 to 49 years and the mean age was 28.02 with a standard deviation of ± 5.554 years. Regarding marital status, 295 (93.1%) of them were married. Among the study participants, 185 (58.4%) were urban residents. Regarding the status of the educational level, 138 (43.5%) of the women were in elementary school and only 12 (3.8%) were in college (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics among pregnant women who attended ANC at bule hora university teaching hospital, guji zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023

Health-related and risky behavior of study participants

Of the 317 pregnant women who participated in the study, 11(3.5%) were HIV-infected patients, 223 (70.3%) of the participants had a use of contraceptive history while 67(21.1%) women had a history of previous candidiasis. Of the total respondents, 173(54.6%) mothers had a history of using antibiotics. Of the total participants, 188(59.3%) had a history of diabetic mellitus. Regarding the gestation period of respondents, 133(42.0%), 101(31.9%), and 83(26.2%) were 2nd trimester, 3rd trimester, and 1st trimester respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Health-related and risky behavior among pregnant women who attended ANC at bule hora university teaching hospital, west guji zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023

Prevalence of vaginal Candida species

In this study, the prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women attended at ANC was 26.8% (85/317) with (95% CI. 21.9 - 31.72%). Of the total Candida species isolates, the predominant was Candida albicans 53 (62.4%), followed by C. glabrata 13 (15.3%). Non-albicans Candida species account for 32 (37.7%) (Fig. 1). The highest frequency of Candida isolates was observed in the age range of 25–30 years with 38 (12%), followed by those above 36 years with 18 (9.9%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Proportion of Candida species isolated from pregnant women at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital, west Guji zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2023

Factors associated with the prevalence of vaginal candidiasis

In bivariate logistic regression analysis those variables having a p-value < 0.25 were considered candidate variable for multivariate logistic regression which include married, housewife, use contraceptives, living in urban residence, antibiotics, third trimester, diabetes mellitus, HIV and previous history of candidiasis. Among the variables included in the final model, the odds ratio of vaginal candidiasis infection was about 5 times higher among pregnant mothers who had a history of using contraceptives (AOR = 5.03, 95% CI, 1.21–11.37). Pregnant women who had a history of previous vaginal candidiasis infection were 6 times more likely to have an infection with previous vaginal candidiasis than those who did not have a history of previous vaginal candidiasis infection (AOR = 6, 95%, CI, 1.61–12.92). Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection was significantly associated with vaginal candidiasis infection, where HIV-infected pregnant mothers were 4 times more likely to be infected by vaginal candidiasis than non- HIV-infected pregnant women (AOR = 4.24, 95%, CI, 1.23–14.14). Pregnant women who had a diabetes mellitus were approximately two times higher risk when compared to those who had no diabetes mellitus disease (AOR = 2.17, 95%, 1.02–4.64). Pregnant women who had a history of frequently using antibiotics were 3 times more likely to have an infection with vaginal candidiasis than those who had not a history of frequently using antibiotics (AOR = 3.55, 95%, CI, 1.67–12.75). Regarding the gestational period, the pregnant women in the 3rd trimester were 8 times at higher risk when compared to pregnant women in the 1st trimester (AOR = 8.72, 95%CI, 1.30–23.07) (Table 3).

Table 3 Bi-variable and multivariable analysis of associated factors with vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women who attended ANC at bule hora university teaching hospital, west guji zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023

Antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species

For antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on 85 vaginal isolates of Candida species. Among the antifungal drug susceptibility amphotericin B and Miconazole were the most effective antifungal drugs for all Candida isolates. The species isolates of C. albicans 16(30.2%) was resistant to fluconazole. The species isolates of C. glabrata were 100% sensitive to itraconazole, miconazole, and amphotericin B, whereas; 3(23.1%), 2(18.4%), 1(7.7%) of the isolates were resistant to fluconazole, ketoconazole, and clotrimazole, respectively. All isolates of C. tropicalis were 100% sensitive to all antifungal drug tests and only fluconazole resisted in 2(7.7%) of isolates. All unidentified Candida isolates were 100% sensitive to all six antifungal drugs. Most of C. krusei was resistant to fluconazole 5(41.7%), ketoconazole 5(41.7%), clotrimazole 2 (16.7%), and only 11(91.7%) was sensitive to amphotericin B (Table 4).

Table 4 Antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species isolated from pregnant women at bule hora university teaching hospital, west guji zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023

Of the total six antifungal drugs; the resistance proportion was highest for fluconazole and ketoconazole with 26(30.6%) and 17(20%) (Table 5).

Table 5 Total susceptibility pattern of Candida species isolated from pregnant women at bule hora university teaching hospital, west guji zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023

Discussion

The present study showed that the overall prevalence of Candida species among pregnant women 26.8% (95% CI, 21.9–31.72) was in line with the study done in Daber Markos referral hospital 25% [23]. It is less than the study conducted in Senegal at 31.93% [32], Lebanon at 39% [33], Dakar Senegal at 32% [34], Kenya at 42.7% [25], and Cameroon at 55.4% [35]. This great variation might be due to geographical environmental factors and differences in lifestyle that affect Candida infection from country to country.

In the current study, the predominant Candida species isolated was Candida albicans; it accounted for 62.35% which is comparable to the study done in Kenya 63.83% [25] and Senegal 62% [32]. The highest frequency of Candida colonization 38 (12%) was observed in the age group of 25–30 years, followed by the age group above 36 (> 36) years 18(9.9%). This finding is compared to the study conducted in Nigeria that showed that pregnant women in the age group 26–30 years had the highest prevalence of infection at 15.4% [36]. This result is in contrast to a study conducted at Debre Markos referral hospital in the northern part of Ethiopia, Candida colonization of 38.5% was observed in the age group of 30–36 years, followed by the age group of 26–33 (31.1%) [23]. The difference may be due to environmental, ethnic, socioeconomic, religious, and cultural factors.

Furthermore, the current study showed that the age group of women between 25 and 30 years of age had a high prevalence of Candida colonization, which is similar to a study conducted in northern Nigeria and Palakkad, India, which showed that pregnant women aged 26 to 30 years recorded the highest prevalence of Candida colonization 37.1% [36] and 39.08% [37]. The reason for this could be related to women in this age group secrete high reproductive hormones that can suppress the immune system and create favourable conditions for Candida colonization [38]. The other possible reason is related to the use of antibiotics that kill bacteria, including normal floras, there by Candida will have an opportunity to colony in the vaginal wall [19].

The present study revealed that the prevalence of vaginal candidiasis infection was about 5 times higher among pregnant mothers who had a history of using contraceptives than non-using contraceptive pregnant mothers. This finding was similar to the report from Tobago University of West India that vaginal candidiasis is higher in pregnant mothers who had a history of using contraceptives than in non-users [29]. The reason for this might be the contraceptive causes many changes in the vaginal environment that might decrease the ability to resist Candida infection.

Moreover, this study showed that pregnant women who had a history of using antibiotics were 3 times more likely to have an infection with vaginal candidiasis than those who had not a history of frequently using antibiotics. This finding is similar to the study conducted at the University of Buena in Cameroon [39]. The reason might be that antibiotics disturb (kill) the normal flora of the human body, which is important for protecting the pathogenic organism, and as a result, high Candida colonization will occur [19].

The findings of this study revealed that HIV infection was significantly associated with vaginal candidiasis infection, where HIV-infected pregnant mothers were 4 times more likely to be infected by vaginal candidiasis than non- HIV-infected pregnant women. The results of this report were consistent with the study carried out at the Debra Markos referral hospital [23]. This reason might be in immunosuppressed patients, vaginal candidiasis can be correlated well with reduced cell-mediated immunity [40]. The findings of the present study reported that pregnant women who had a history of previous vaginal candidiasis infection were 6 times more likely to have an infection with vaginal candidiasis than those who had not a history of previous vaginal candidiasis infection. This result agreed with the study conducted in Uganda that showed that the majority of respondents had previously had vaginal candidiasis [41]. The possible reason might be due to the shortage of health facilities disseminating information about the cause and effects of vaginal candidiasis and testes.

The present study revealed that pregnant women who had a history of diabetic mellitus were approximately two times at higher risk compared with those who had no history of diabetes mellitus disease. This result report agrees with the study conducted in India [42] and the Debra Markos referral hospital [23]. This could be in diabetes mellitus; glucose concentrations increase in the vaginal secretions that stimulate the adherence of epithelial cells [43]. The present study showed that the gestational period pregnant women in the 3rd trimester were 8 times at higher risk when compared with pregnant women in the 1st trimester. This report is compared to the study conducted in Kenya [25] and Nigeria [36]. However, our findings were in contrast to another study conducted in Uganda which revealed that the 2nd trimester has the highest number of VVC and the least positivity was taken from 3rd trimester pregnant women [41]. This difference might be due to the study design and sample size of the study participants that we used.

In the present study, a high resistance rate was observed for fluconazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, and itraconazole with (30.6%), (20%), (9.4%) and (7.1%) respectively. This finding was similar to a study done in Uganda, which reported high resistance (37.6%), (25.5%) (and 9.6%), fluconazole, itraconazole, and clotrimazole, respectively [44]. The present study revealed that the species isolates of C. glabrata were 100% sensitive to itraconazole, miconazole, and amphotericin B, whereas; 3(23.1%), 2(18.4%), 1(7.7%) of the isolate were resistance to fluconazole, ketoconazole, and clotrimazole respectively. This finding was compared to the study conducted at the Beijing Centre, China, which showed that the C. glabrata resisted clotrimazole 16.6%, fluconazole 19.2%, ketoconazole 15.2%, and only miconazole was active against 56.5% of isolates [45].

Furthermore, the present study showed that of the total of six antifungal drugs; the resistance proportion was highest for fluconazole (30.6%), ketoconazole (20%) and clotrimazole (9.6%). This result was in contrast to the study conducted in Pakistan which indicated that most Candida spp. tested were resistant to fluconazole (62%), clotrimazole (59.3%), ketoconazole (58.3%), and itraconazole (40.7%) [46]. The possible reason for this high resistance might be due to the inappropriate use of antifungal drugs during the diagnosis of fungal infection.

The strengths and limitations of the study

The strength of the study was the data collected from patients and it was the primary data that increased the completeness and consistency of the data. The limitations of the study are the cross-sectional design of the study makes it challenging to establish causal relationships. Molecular-level species identification wasn’t performed due to resource constraints. Differentiating Candida species solely by the color of colonies on Chromagar Candida may result in incorrect identification. In addition, not all antifungal susceptibility was achieved due to resource constraints, and no more reagents were found in the country was limited only by the limited number of drugs.

Conclusion and recommendation

The study findings indicated a high prevalence of vaginal candidiasis in the study. The most common species was C. albicans, followed by C. glabrata, C. krusei and C. tropicalis. The proportion of Candida among pregnant women with previous candidiasis was significantly higher than those without previous candidiasis. Factors such as prior use of antibiotics, diabetes mellitus, and HIV (immunocompromised state) before candidiasis and before pregnancy were significantly associated with vaginal candidiasis. Furthermore, the prevalence of Candida was notably high among women aged 25–30. In terms of antifungal drug susceptibility, Amphotericin B and Miconazole were found to be the most effective for all Candida isolates. Resistance proportions were highest for fluconazole and ketoconazole out of the six antifungal drugs tested. Notably, C. glabrata isolates showed 100% sensitivity to itraconazole, miconazole, and amphotericin B, with varying degrees of resistance to fluconazole, ketoconazole, and clotrimazole. It is recommended that healthcare providers implement infection prevention strategies during admissions to healthcare facilities to mitigate Candida infections. Furthermore, health education regarding the risks of Candida infections is advised at both zonal and healthcare facility levels to reduce vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women. A population-based study is warranted to ascertain the exact prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women in the study area.

Data availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal Care

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

AST:

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

COR:

Crude odds ratio

CLSI:

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute

DM:

Diabetes Mellitus

GTT:

Germ Tube Test

HCAM:

Hi- Chrome Agar Media

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

KOH:

Potassium Hydroxide

MICs:

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

NAC:

Non- Albicans Candida

SDA:

Sabroud Dextrose Agar

VVC:

Vulvo Vaginal Candidiasis

References

  1. Mohamed AO, Mohamed MS, Mallhi TH, Hussain MA, Jalloh MA, Omar KA, et al. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis among pregnant women in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Developing Ctries. 2022;16(08):1243–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bitew A, Abebaw Y, Bekele D, Mihret A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors among women complaining of genital tract infection. Int J Microbiol. 2017;1:4919404.

  3. Gonçalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT, Henriques M, Azeredo J, Silva S. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(6):905–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Denning DW, Kneale M, Sobel JD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):e339–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendling W, Friese K, Mylonas I, Weissenbacher E-R, Brasch J, Schaller M, et al. Vulvovaginal candidosis (excluding chronic mucocutaneous candidosis). Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF registry 015/072, S2k level, December 2013). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015;75(04):342–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaur H, Wadhwa K, Jain K, Yadav A. Multidrug-resistant Candida Auris: a global challenge. J Appl Biology Biotechnol. 2021;9(1):104–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peters BM, Yano J, Noverr MC, Fidel PL Jr. Candida vaginitis: when opportunism knocks, the host responds. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(4):e1003965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Achkar JM, Fries BC. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;23(2):253–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamath P, Pais M, Nayak MG. Risk of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2013;2:141–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chew SY, Than LTL. Vulvovaginal candidosis: contemporary challenges and the future of prophylactic and therapeutic approaches. Mycoses. 2016;59(5):262–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4(2):119–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nobile CJ, Johnson AD. Candida albicans biofilms and human disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:71–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shinkafi S, Salisu N, Mohammed N, Isah K. Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in selected hospitals within Gusau, Zamfara State, Nigeria. Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in selected hospitals within Gusau, Zamfara State, Nigeria.Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in selected hospitals within Gusau, Zamfara State, Nigeria. 2021;34(2): 229-234

  14. Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front Microbiol. 2017;7:2173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dovnik A, Golle A, Novak D, Arko D, Takač I. Treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: a review of the literature. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2015;24(1):5–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitew A, Abebaw Y. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: species distribution of Candida and their antifungal susceptibility pattern. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodríguez-Cerdeira C, Gregorio MC, Molares-Vila A, López-Barcenas A, Fabbrocini G, Bardhi B, et al. Biofilms and vulvovaginal candidiasis. Colloids Surf B. 2019;174:110–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sangaré I, Sirima C, Bamba S, Zida A, Cissé M, Bazié W, et al. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy at three health centers in Burkina Faso. J De Mycol Medicale. 2018;28(1):186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gulati M, Nobile CJ. Candida albicans biofilms: development, regulation, and molecular mechanisms. Microbes Infect. 2016;18(5):310–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. de Cassia Orl J, de Souza Pitangui N, Gullo P, e Maria AMFA, Giannini JSM. A mini-review of Candida species in hospital infection: epidemiology, virulence factor, and drugs resistance and prophylaxis. Tropical Medicine & Surgery; 2013.

  21. Ragunathan L, Poongothai G, Sinazer AR, Kannaiyan K, Gurumurthy H, Jaget N, et al. Phenotypic characterization and antifungal susceptibility pattern to fluconazole in Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis in a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Research: JCDR. 2014;8(5):DC01.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mutua F, Revathi G, Machoki J. Species distribution and antifungal sensitivity patterns of vaginal yeasts. East Afr Med J. 2020;87(4):156–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsega A, Mekonnen F. Prevalence, risk factors and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida species among pregnant women at Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-akeel RA, El-kersh TA, Al-Sheikh YA, Al-Ahmadey ZZ. Prevalence and comparison for detection methods of Candida species in vaginal specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant Saudi women. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2018;7(1):56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson M, Wanjiru W, Margaret MW. Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis and determination of the occurrence of Candida species in pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of Thika District Hospital, Kenya. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2018;2013.

  26. Ahmad Hussin N, Pathirana RU, Hasim S, Tati S, Scheib-Owens JA, Nickerson KW. Biotin auxotrophy and biotin enhanced germ tube formation in Candida albicans. Microorganisms. 2016;4(3):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Deorukhkar SC, Saini S, Jadhav P. Evaluation of different media for germ tube production of Candida albicans and Candida Dubliniensis. IJBAR. 2022;3(09):704–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved Standard CLSI Document M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.

  29. Akpaka PE, Ashraph K, Ivey MA, Unakal C, Kurhade A. Epidemiological evaluation of risk factors associated with vaginal candidiasis in a cross-section of pregnant women in Trinidad and Tobago. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022;26(3):46–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Masri SN, Noor SM, Nor LAM, Osman M, Rahman MM. Candida isolates from pregnant women and their antifungal susceptibility in a Malaysian tertiary-care hospital. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2015;31(3):658.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Foessleitner P, Petricevic L, Boerger I, Steiner I, Kiss H, Rieger A, et al. HIV infection as a risk factor for vaginal dysbiosis, bacterial vaginosis, and candidosis in pregnancy: a matched case-control study. Birth. 2021;48(1):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheikh SM, Elie EP, Thiam GPA, Cheikh F, Moustapha M, Khadim D, et al. Identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis in Dakar. J Yeast Fungal Res. 2023;14(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghaddar N, Anastasiadis E, Halimeh R, Ghaddar A, Dhar R, AlFouzan W, et al. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans causing vaginal discharge among pregnant women in Lebanon. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Boye CSB, Dubrous P, Mahou C, Diallo TA, Koumondji LKM, Mangou K et al. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis at Institute Pasteur of Dakar, Senegal: Prevalence and Associated Risk factors. J Adv Microbiol. 2022: 113–119.

  35. Toua V, Djaouda M, Gaké B, Menye DE, Christie E, Tambe E, et al. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis amongst pregnant women in Maroua (Cameroon) and the sensitivity of Candida albicans to extracts of six locally used antifungal plants. Int Res J Microbiol. 2019;4(3):89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ekwealor CC, Okoro EO, Oyeka CA, Amasiani R. Vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women in Ebonyi State, South East Nigeria. Bioscientist J. 2023;11(2):220–30.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nnadi DC, Singh S. The prevalence of genital Candida species among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary health center in North-West Nigeria. Sahel Med J. 2017;20(1):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Okonkwo N, Umeanaeto P. Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women in Nnewi Town of Anambra State, Nigeria. Afr Res Rev. 2020; 4(4).

  39. Nsongmayi ED, Ambe NF. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in patients attending the Buea Regional Hospital-Cameroon: Prevalence and risk factors. 2023.

  40. Olowe O, Makanjuola O, Olowe R, Adekanle D. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Southwestern Nigeria. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2014;4(4):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Richard M. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among pregnant women who attended Antenatal Clinic at Kamuli General Hospital. IAA J Appl Sci. 2023; 20(1): 359–65.

  42. Irene V, Sajeeth C, Karthikeyan V. Assessment of Risk factors for developing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among women at various age groups. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2023;20(1):359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Salehei Z, Seifi Z, ZAREI MA. Sensitivity of vaginal isolates of Candida to eight antifungal drugs isolated from Ahvaz, Iran. 2018.

  44. Watsemwa J, Iramiot J, Kalule JB. Prevalence and Antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida isolated on CHROM agar TM Candida at a tertiary referral hospital, Eastern Uganda. Micro Res J Inter. 2019;28(6):1-6.

  45. Wang F-J, Zhang D, Liu Z-H, Wu W-X, Bai H-H, Dong H-Y. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of vulvovaginal Candida isolates in China. Chin Med J. 2016;129(10):1161–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Khan M, Ahmed J, Gul A, Ikram A, Lalani FK. Antifungal susceptibility testing of vulvovaginal Candida species among women attending antenatal clinic in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First, I would like to acknowledge Bule Hora University institute of health department of medical laboratory Sciences for giving me this chance to prepare a research work. Secondly, I extend my sincere gratitude to the staff members of Medical Laboratory Science for their timely support and positive approach. Lastly, I also like to express my sincere gratitude to my study participants, Bule Hora University teaching hospital, and the Head office of the hospital for their cooperation.

Funding

No fund is received at any stage of this paper’s development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ibrahim Hussen: Conceptualization, developed proposal, resource, project administration, investigation, and supervision, performed data analysis and interpretation, and wrote, read and approved the final manuscript. Alqeer Aliyo and Moorthy Kannaiyan Abbai: Data curation, formal analysis, software, investigation, and supervision; performed data analysis and interpretation; and wrote, read and approved the final manuscript. Wako Dedecha: Data curation, software, investigation, and supervision; performed data analysis and interpretation; and wrote, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alqeer Aliyo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval of this study was reviewed and approved by Bule Hora University’s Institutional Review Committee (Ref no: BHUIRC04/2022). Official letters were sent to the health office and supporting letters to Bule Hora University. Written informed consent was obtained from participants in their simple language about the infection, the purpose of the investigation, and the benefits of the study. To ensure the confidentiality of participants’ information, codes were used and any identifier of the participants were not written on the questionnaire. Participants were interviewed alone to ensure privacy. Only voluntary participants were asked, and they had a right to refuse to participate in the study. The results were given to the healthcare provider who was working in the ANC room of the hospital for further diagnosis and treatment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussen, I., Aliyo, A., Abbai, M.K. et al. Vaginal candidiasis prevalence, associated factors, and antifungal susceptibility patterns among pregnant women attending antenatal care at bule hora university teaching hospital, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 619 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06844-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06844-x

Keywords