Title | Reference no: | Domain 1: Scope and purpose | Domain 2: Stakeholder involvement (%) | Domain 3: Rigour of development (%) | Domain 4: Clarity of presentation (%) | Domain 5: Applicability (%) | Domain 6: Editorial independence (%) | Overall quality (%) | Recommended for use |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toward Optimised Practice (TOP) Clinical practice guideline: Ultrasound for twin and multiple pregnancies (2017). | Good (69%) | Fair (25%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (33%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (25%) | YWM | |
ACOG- Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher Order Multifetal Pregnancies. Practice Bulletin No. 231 (2021). | [47] | Fair (39%) | Poor (17%) | Poor (20%) | Average (50%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (17%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
ACOG- Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Committee opinion No. 719 (2017). | [45] | Excellent (86%) | Fair (36%) | Poor (10%) | Average (53%) | Poor (6%) | Poor (0%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
ACR, Multiple Gestations (2017). | [44] | Good (72%) | Fair (39%) | Good (72%) | Excellent (81%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (13%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
Ãœberwachung und Betreuung von Zwillingsschwangerschaften (Screening, management and delivery in twin pregnancy) (2020). | [32] | Good (64%) | Average (47%) | Good (61%) | Excellent 83 (%) | Poor (8%) | Poor (8%) | Good (75%) | YWM |
Grossesses gemellaires (Twin pregnancies): guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (2019). | [27] | Good (67%) | Fair (39%) | Average (47%) | Average (42%) | Poor (4%) | Poor (17%) | Average (58%) | YWM |
Tvillinger - håndtering af graviditet og fødsel (twins- handling pregnancy and childbirth) (2010). | [30] | Fair (39%) | Fair (25%) | Poor (19%) | Fair (36%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (33%) | YWM |
Tvillinger – Håndtering af fødslen (Twins- handling the birth) (2020). | [31] | Fair (39%) | Fair (25%) | Fair (23%) | Average (47%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (0%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
FIGO Committee Report: GCP advice, management of twin pregnancy (2019). | [29] | Fair (28%) | Fair (25%) | Poor (13%) | Fair (39%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (13%) | Fair (25%) | YWM |
FIGO Role of ultrasonography in the management of twin gestation (2018). | [34] | Good (69%) | Fair (25%) | Poor (5%) | Fair (39%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (21%) | Average (42%) | YWM |
Twin pregnancy, South Australia (2018). | [28] | Good (72%) | Fair (31%) | Poor (7%) | 39 (Fair%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (25%) | YWM |
HSE, Management of multiple pregnancy (2012). | [42] | Good (61%) | Fair (22%) | Fair (28%) | Average (42%) | Poor (13%) | Poor (0%) | Average (42%) | YWM |
ISPD International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis Position Statement: cell free (cf.)DNA screening for Down syndrome in multiple pregnancies (2021). | [46] | Excellent (81%) | Average (56%) | Fair (21%) | Average (44%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (0%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
ISUOG Practice Guideline: Role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy (2016). | [9] | Good (75%) | Average (44%) | Average44%) | Excellent (83%) | Poor (2%) | Poor (0%) | Average (58%) | YWM |
Daugiavaisis nestumas (Multiple pregnancy) (2014). | [49] | Average (42%) | Poor (14%) | Poor (7%) | Average (42%) | Average (54%) | Poor (0%) | Average (42%) | YWM |
NICE, Twin and Triplet Pregnancy (2019). | [41] | Excellent (89%) | Good (64%) | Average (59%) | Excellent81 | Fair (27%) | Average (42%) | Excellent (83%) | Yes |
New South Wales Government- Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy (2020). | [36] | Good (67%) | Fair (33%) | Poor (13%) | Average (47%) | Fair (21%) | Poor (0%) | Fair (33%) | YWM |
RANZCOG Best Practice Statement: Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy (2021). | [38] | Excellent (94%) | Average (53%) | Average (47%) | Excellent (83%) | Poor (8%) | Excellent (83%) | Good (67%) | YWM |
RCOG Green-top Guideline 51: Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy (2016). | [39] | Excellent (81%) | Average (47%) | Average (54%) | Excellent (89%) | Poor (19%) | Average (46%) | Good (67%) | YWM |
Gestatione della gravidanza multipla (Management of multiple pregnancy) (2016). | [40] | Good (61%) | Fair (22%) | Fair (22%) | Good (75%) | Poor (6%) | Poor (0%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
SMFM Special Statement: Updated checklists for management of monochorionic twin pregnancy (2020). | [37] | Excellent (83%) | Fair (36%) | Poor (20%) | Good (69%) | Average (56%) | Excellent (83%) | Average (50%) | YWM |
SMFM Special Statement: State of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance (2020). | [43] | Fair (36%) | Poor (14%) | Poor (18%) | Poor (8%) | Poor (8%) | Poor (1%) | Poor (8%) | YWM |
SOGC- Guideline No. 262: Prenatal screening for diagnostics of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies (2011). | [35] | Excellent (86%) | Fair (36%) | Average (44%) | Excellent (81%) | Poor (0%) | Poor (13%) | Good (75%) | YWM |
SOGC- Guideline No. 260: Ultrasound in twin pregnancies (2011). | [33] | Excellent (83%) | Fair (28%) | Average (50%) | Good (69%) | Poor (2%) | Poor (0%) | Good (67%) | YWM |