Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparision of patients demographic & perioperative details between peripartum hysterectomy and myometrial reapir

From: Conservative surgical approach towards placenta accreta spectrum disorders for uterine preservation

 

Peripartum Hysterectomy

Myometrial Repair

p value

Number of Subjects

10

10

 

Age (yrs) ± SD, Median

35.1 ± 3.21, 34.5

34.4 ± 3.44, 33.5

0.644

BMI ± SD, Median

28.6 ± 4.70, 28.9

25.0 ± 4.90, 24.6

0.115

Gestational age (wks) ± SD, Median

34.0 ± 3.34, 34.9

34.5 ± 2.72, 34.5

0.695

US

10/10(100%)

10/10(100%)

1.00

 Low lying placenta

2

2

 

 Features of PASD

6

6

 

 Placenta upper

1

0

 

MRI (%)

4/10 (40%)

5/10 (50%)

 

Grading of PASD by MRI

Accreta (2)

Accreta (2)

 

Increta (1)

Increta (2)

 

Percreta (1)

Percreta (1)

 

Grading of PASD by Histology

Accreta (2)

  

Increta (4)

Not done

 

Percreta (2)

  

At least one features of PASD(US/MRI/Histology)

8/10

9/10

 

Internal Iliac Artery Catheter (IIAC) (%)

5/10 (50%)

5/10 (50%)

1.00

Surgical time(min) ± SD, Median

164 ± 62.3, 148

117 ± 27.1, 121

0.050

Estimated blood loss(ml) ± SD

(minimum – maximum)

2570 ± 1739

(900–6000)

2090 ± 1385

(800–4000)

0.503

Transfusion

10/10 (100%)

8/10 (80%)

0.136

Duration of hospital stay(day) ± SD, Median

5.4 ± 2.2, 4.5

4.3 ± 1.2, 4.0

0.175

ICU admission

10/10 (100%)

8/10 (80%)

0.264

Visceral injuries

1 (bladder)

0

 

Previous number of CS

  

0.096

 1

3/10 (30%)

6/10 (60%)

 

 2

1/10 (10%)

3/10 (30%)

 

 3

4/10 (40%)

0/10 (0%)

 

 4

2/10 (20%)

1/10 (10%)