Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression of pregnancy outcomes in different treatment protocols

From: Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis

Pregnancy outcomes

Original cohort

 

PSM cohort

 

Crude OR a (95% CI)

 

Adjusted OR b (95% CI)

 

Crude OR a (95% CI)

 

Adjusted OR c (95% CI)

Clinical pregnancy rate

1.82(1.12,2.97) d

 

1.73(0.90,3.32)

 

1.30(0.83,2.05)

 

1.28(0.75,2.21)

Miscarriage rate

1.49(0.77,2.90)

 

1.85(0.73,4.71)

 

1.10(0.47,2.59)

 

1.27(0.43,3.73)

Live birth rate

1.43(0.88,2.33)

 

1.22(0.65,2.30)

 

1.39(0.81,2.38)

 

1.29(0.66,2.54)

Preterm delivery rate

1.55(0.72,3.30)

 

1.53(0.57,4.07)

 

2.20(0.76,6.33)

 

2.06(0.52,8.25)

Cumulative live birth rate

1.71(1.04,2.82) d

 

1.17(0.58,2.38)

 

1.10(0.71,1.70)

 

0.98(0.58,1.67)

  1. Note: Group A = GnRH antagonist protocol and freeze-all strategy; Group B = long-acting GnRH agonist protocol; PSM = propensity-score matching; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; BMI = body mass index; AFC = antral follicle count
  2. a No adjustments for covariates
  3. b Adjusted for age, BMI, AFC, basal uterine volume, number of transferred embryos, embryo stage, number of transferred high-quality embryos, number of available embryos
  4. c Adjusted for basal uterine volume, number of transferred embryos, embryo stage, number of transferred high-quality embryos, number of available embryos
  5. d P < 0.05
Back to article page

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us