Skip to main content

Table 4 Cost analysis comparing usual care to theoretical test scenarios in the first week after baseline

From: Clinical value and cost analysis of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in addition to the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio in women with suspected pre-eclampsia: PREPARE cohort study

Health care use

Prices (€)

Usual care (€)

Scenario 1 (€) a

Difference 1 (€)

Scenario 2 (€)a

Difference 2 (€)

sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test

80

15,920

+ 15,920

15,920

+ 15,920

Admissions b

71 + 590/day

52,227

45,120

− 7107

39,571

−12,656

Home monitoring c

109 + 108/day

4752

0

− 4752

0

−4752

Additional outpatient clinic visits/Telemonitoring d

168/visit

121/patient

14,279

8231

− 6047

6541

− 7738

Total per cohort

71,258

69,271

− 1987

62,032

− 9226

Total per patient

358

348

−10

312

−46

  1. Data depicted in Euros (€)
  2. aScenario 1 = both tests negative (A−/−), no additional health care use in the following week; one of both tests positive (B−/+ and C+/−), one extra outpatient visit the next week and admissions conform usual care; both tests positive (D+/+), direct admission of all patients. Scenario 2: both tests negative (A−/−), no additional health care use in the following week; one of both tests positive (B−/+ and C+/−), telemonitoring during the next week and “correct” admissions conform usual care; both tests positive (D+/+), direct admission of all patients
  3. bMean length of stay was used for calculations. Calculations admissions usual care: 29 × 71 + 590x(7 × 1.6 + 5 × 4.4 + 8 × 3.1 + 9 × 3.0), Scenario 1: 22 × 71 + 590x(7 × 1.6 + 5 × 4.4 + 8 × 3.1 + 9 × 3.0). Scenario 2: 17 × 71 + 590x(4 × 4.5 + 4 × 5.0 + 9 × 3.0)
  4. cAverage number of days of home monitoring during the first week (4.5 days) was used. Calculations home monitoring usual care: 8 × 109 + 108 × 36
  5. dCalculations outpatient visits usual care: 168 × 85. Scenario 1: 168 × 30. Scenario 2 (telemonitoring): 121 × 54