Skip to main content

Table 2 Multilevel Analysis of Odd Ratios on the effect of Individual, Household and Community level factors in influencing the timing of ANC Utilization in Uganda, UDHS 2016

From: Factors associated with Women’s timing of first antenatal care visit during their last pregnancy: evidence from 2016 Uganda demographic health survey

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Empty Model

Individual level

Community level

Individual/Community level

Odd Ratio (95% CI)

Odd Ratio (95% CI)

Odd Ratio (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

INDIVIDUAL VARIABLES

Age at last birth

  < =19

 

1.00

 

1.00

 20–29

 

1.18 (0. .97–1.44)

 

1.18 (0.97–1.44)

 30–39

 

1.12 (0.89–1.42)

 

+ 1.14 (0.89–1.46)

 40+

 

1.05 (0.70–1.41)

 

1.05 (0.73–1.51)

Marital Status

 Single

 

1.00

 

1.00

 Married

 

1.13* (1.01–1.70)

 

1.25 (0.95–1.64)

 Living together

 

1.11 (0.86–1.44)

 

1.05 (0.81–1.37)

 Previous married

 

1.41* (1.05–1.89)

 

1.35 (0.99–1.83)

Parity

 1

 

1

 

1.00

 2–3

 

0.93 (0.78–1.11)

 

0.89 (0.75–1.07)

 4+

 

0.78* (0.63–0.96)

 

0.74* (0.60–0.92)

Family Size

  < =4

 

1.00

 

1.00

 5–6

 

0. .94 (0.78–1.11)

 

0.95 (0.81–1.12)

 7+

 

0.87 (0.63–0.96)

 

0.85 (0.72–1.01)

Level of Education

 No education

 

1.00

  

 Primary

 

0.93 (0.77–1.13)

  

 Secondary or Higher

 

1.001 (0.80–1.26)

  

Religion

 Anglican

 

1.00

 

1.00

 Catholic

 

0.95 (0.83–1.09)

 

0.99 (0.86–1.15)

 Muslim

 

0.84 (0.68–1.05)

 

0.89 (0.71–1.11)

 Other’s

 

0.97 (0.79–1.13)

 

0.96 (0.80–1.15)

Employment Status

 Unemployed

 

1.00

 

1.00

 Employed

 

1.16 (0.99–1.35)

 

1.17 (0.99–1.37)

COMMUNITY VARIABLES

Community Distance to Health Facility

 Inaccessible

  

1.00

1

 Accessible

  

1.35**(1.04–1.75)

1.36*(1.04–1.77)

Community Ethnicity Diversity Index

 Less Diverse

  

1.00

1.00

 More Diverse

  

0.15***(0.11–0.22)

0.15***(0.11–0.22)

Community Media Saturation

 Less Saturated

  

1.00

 

 Saturated

  

0.89 (0.71–1.13)

 

Random effect results:

 PSU Variance (95% CI)

0.757(0.62–.93)

0.734(0.60–0.90)

0.987(0.793–1.229)

0.965(0.78–1.20)

 ICC

0.19

0.18

0.23

0.23

 Wild chi-square and p-value

Ref

χ2 = 37.73, p < 0.003

χ2 = 116.70, p < 0.000

χ2 = 159.31, p < 0.000

Model fitness:

 Log-likelihood

−2,041,788.8

−2,031,440.7

−1,894,570.9

−1,885,488

 AIC

4,083,582

4,062,917

3,789,152

3,771,012

 PSU

649

649

649

649

 N

9443

9443

9298

9298

  1. The Empty Model contain no variables, but it partitioned the variance into two component parts. AIC Akaike Information Criterion, CI Confidence Interval,® Reference category,® reference category, AOR Adjusted Odd Ratio’s, ICC Inter-classical correlations, Significant level, ***p = <.001, **p < .01, *p < .05. PSU Primary sampling unit, N Number