Skip to main content

Table 3 CASP methodological quality appraisal of quantitative studies

From: Insider knowledge as a double-edged sword: an integrative review of midwives’ personal childbearing experiences

CASP Item

CASP Key

Battersby (2002) [29]

Leinweber et al. (2017) [30]

McMulkin & Malone (1994) [31]

Toohil et al. (2019) [32]

1

Did the study address a clearly focused issue?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

2

Were the participants recruited in an acceptable way?

Yes

Yes

Yesa

Yes

3

Was the exposure accurately measured to minimise bias?

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4

Was the outcome accurately measured to minimise bias?

Unclear^

Yes

Unclearb

Clear

5a

Have the authors identified all important confounding factors?

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

5b

Have they taken account of the confounding factors in the design and/or analysis?

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

6

A) Was the follow up of subjects complete enough? B) Was the follow up of subjects long enough?

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7

What are the results of this study?

Clear

Clear

Clear

Clear

8

How precise are the results?

Unclear

Clear

Unclear

Clear

9

Do you believe the results?

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

10

Can the results be applied to the local population?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

11

Do the results of the study fit with other available evidence?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

12

What are the implications of this study for practice?

Clear

Clear

Clear

Clear

  1. Convenience sample
  2. b Reliability and validity of the questionnaire not reported