Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of maternal characteristics and birth outcomes between intrapartum massage application

From: The impact of antenatal massage practice on intrapartum massage application and their associations with the use of analgesics during labour

 

aIntrapartum massage application

(Median: 21.1% IQR 10.3–46.6)

> Median

N = 110

=/< Median

N = 102

P values

Maternal Characteristics

 Age mean (+/−SD)

31.3 (3.8)

31.2 (3.7)

0.98

 Height mean (+/−SD, cm)

158.6 (5.2)

158.2 (5.8)

0.60

 BMI at first booking mean (+/−SD)

26.3 (3.2)

26.5 (3.1)

0.65

 Education (%)

  

0.73

  • Secondary

30 (27.3)

30 (29.4)

 

  • Tertiary or above

80 (72.7)

72 (70.6)

 

 Occupation (%)

  

0.20

  • Housewives

18 (16.4)

22 (21.6)

 

  • Nonprofessional

67 (60.9)

66 (64.7)

  • Professional

25 (22.7)

14 (13.7)

 Income (%)

  

0.55

  • < HK$20000

14 (12.7)

18 (17.6)

 

  • HK$20000 to HK$40000

58 (52.7)

48 (47.1)

  • > HK$40000

38 (34.5)

36 (35.3)

Birth Outcomes

 Augmentation of labour

15 (14.6)

10 (9.2)

0.22

 Reasons for augmentation of labour

  

0.42

  • Poor progress

5 (33.3)

6 (60.0)

 

  • Inadequate uterine contractions

5 (33.3)

2 (20.0)

  • Infection risk

5 (33.3)

2 (20.0)

 Duration of first labour

  

0.58

  • < = 6 hours

50 (45.5)

40 (39.2)

 

  • > 6–12 hours

45 (40.9)

44 (43.1)

  • > 12 hours

15 (13.6)

18 (17.6)

 Mode of delivery

  

0.62

  • Normal vaginal delivery

87 (79.1)

75 (73.5)

 

  • Instrumental delivery

12 (10.9)

15 (14.7)

  • Caesarean section

11 (10.0)

12 (11.8)

  1. aIntrapartum application was defined as the % of first stage of labour with massage practice