Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of research articles (n = 18) on the impact of polygamous marriages on women

From: Psychological impact of polygamous marriage on women and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

Study Area

Study design

Sample size (n)

Polygamous marriage (n)

Monogamous marriage (n)

Quality assessment (%)

Abbo 2008 [29]

Uganda

Cross-sectional

209

37

90

100

Al- Sherbiny 2005 [33]

Egypt

Cross-sectional

100

50

50

100

Daradkeh 2006 [35]

Jordan

Cross-sectional

2000

544

947

100

Hamdan 2008 [37]

United Arab Emirates

Cross-sectional

224

28

155

100

Kianpoor 2006 [38]

Iran

Cross-sectional

66

31

26

75

Maziak 2002 [39]

Syria

Cross-sectional

412

26

331

100

Ozkan 2006 [41]

Turkey

Cross-sectional

138

88

50

100

Patil 2008 [42]

Tanzania

Cross-sectional

408

96

312

87.5

Ozer 2013 [40]

Turkey

Cross-sectional

172

99

73

87.5

Farahmand 2019 [36]

Iran

Cross-sectional

398

248

150

100

Yilmaz 2018 [43]

Turkey

Cross-sectional

108

72

36

100

Daoud 2014 [34]

Israel

Cross-sectional

461

100

361

87.5

Al-Krenawi 2001 [4]

Israel

Cross-sectional

92

53

39

100

Al-Krenawi 2006 [9]

Israel

Cross-sectional

352

117

235

87.5

Al-Krenawi 2008 [32]

Israel

Cross-sectional

315

156

159

100

Al-Krenawi 2011 [31]

Israel

Cross-sectional

199

93

106

100

Al-Krenawi 2012 [30]

Israel

Cross-sectional

309

187

122

100

Chaleby 1985 [28]

Kuwait

Cross-sectional

125

31

 

62.5