Skip to main content

Table 4 Review of RFA studies

From: Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation

Study

Case

,n

Chorionicity

The overall survival rate,%

The mean/median Gestational Age at RFA

The mean/median Gestational Age at Delivery

Birthweight(g)

Indications of RFA

Cycles of RFA coagulation

Duration of RFA (min)

TTTS

sFGR

DA

MFPR

TRAPS

TAPS

current study

306

215 M

26 D

78.76

20.57 (17.82–23.29)

36.23 ± 3.23

2570 ± 736

91

83

78

32

19

3

193n ≤ 2

48n>2

169n ≤ 15

72n>

15

Wang et al. (2021) [13]

272

272 M

73.9

20.05 ± 3.41

36.34 ± 2.9

2662.48 ± 707.8

64

60

66

70

12

0

NA

NA

Shinar et al. (2021) [14]

74

74 M

91.9

19.3 ± 4

34.5 ± 6.5

2477 ± 1016

6

9

24

0

35

0

NA

27.4 ± 15.8

TING et al. (2021) [15]

63

61 M

2 D

73.02

17.4 (13.6–19.1)

36.2 (35–38.8)

2497(2170–2926)

12

10

17

9

13

2

NA

40n < 4

4n > 4

Rahimi-Sharbaf et al. (2021) [16]

143

143 M

71.3

21 ± 2.3

34.6 ± 3.3

NA

48

52

33

0

10

0

Usually, 2–3

NA

Liu et al. (2021) [17]

56

56 M

73.2

20.5 ± 3.3

31.6 ± 6.5

NA

26

11

9

4

4

0

NA

NA

Dadhwal et al. (2021) [18]

44

44 M

77.3

22.29(14–26.86)

35(32.14–37)

2138 ± 742

23

5

7

0

9

0

NA

usually< 15

Gabby et al. (2020) [19]

36

36 M

75

19.78

36.6(23.7–41)

NA

2

10

9

0

15

0

50n < 4

9n ≥ 4

NA

Dadhwal et al. (2019) [20]

14

14 M

71.4

24.43(16–26.57)

36(28–38)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sun et al. (2018) [21]

183

183 M

77

19.6(17.3–22.5)

36.8 (33.2–38.5)

NA

35

53

24

36

35

0

152n ≤ 2

25n>2

6 (4–7)

Abdel-Sattar et al. (2018) [22]

18

18 M

66.7

19.1 (16.9–25.4)

34.6 (17.4–40.1)

2857 (538–4451)

0

2

6

0

10

0

NA

NA

Wang et al. (2017) [23]

33

M

84

20.2 ± 3.8

36.9 ± 2.6

2700(2275–3025)

6

4

10

11

2

0

NA

NA

Peng et al. (2016) [24]

45

45 M

71.1

19.86(18.14–26.71)

31.57(22.29–40.86)

1575 (250–3400)

15

10

8

0

12

0

NA

NA

Yinon et al. (2015) [25]

36

36 M

88.9

21.3 (17.7–24.3)

35.0 (29.8–38.0)

2405 (1606–3220)

6

19

7

0

4

0

≤3

≤12

Kumar et al. (2014) [26]

100

82 M

18 D

78.0

17.96 (12.14–27.57

35.2(24–41)

NA

28

8

38

14

12

0

2–3

most cases ≤15

Berg et al. (2014) [27]

7

7 M

85.7

23.0 ± 5.0

32.3 ± 5.3

NA

0

0

0

0

7

0

NA

6

Van Den Bos et al. (2013) [28]

11

11 M

63.6

15(14–18)

34(23–38)

NA

1

2

2

1

5

0

NA

NA

Lu et al. (2013) [29]

10

10 M

NA

15.6 (12.3–19.6)

35.9(32.4–38.6)

NA

1

2

4

0

3

0

most ≤2

little>2

NA

Cabassa et al. (2013) [30]

7

7 M

71

17.43(13.14–23.14)

33.00

NA

0

0

0

0

7

0

1–3

≤6

Bebbington et al. (2012) [31]

58

58 M

70.7

20.2 ± 2.2

33.0 (23.4–38.9)

NA

15

19

6

0

18

0

NA

NA

Roman et al. (2010) [32]

20

20 M

87

20.3 (17–29)

36 (26–41)

2350 ± 1164

4

2

8

0

6

0

≤3

2

Paramasivam et al. (2010) [33]

35

29 M

6 D

88.6

17.4 (12.71–27.57)

36(21.86–41)

NA

11

4

9

6

5

0

NA

12(median)

Moise et al. (2008) [34]

9

9 M

66.0

19.5 (18.6–22)

36.1(26.0–39.2)

NA

3

0

6

0

0

0

NA

6

  1. N/A not applicable; M Monochorionic; D Dichorionic; DA Discordant Anomalies