Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review

Author, Year Ref

Subject

Study objective

N outcomes in COS

Methods

Consensus criteria for inclusion in the COS

Stakeholders included

Participants: N included, % answering all surveys, N at meeting

Protocol (Y/N)

Comet Registration number

Compliance with COS-STAR

Pregnancy

 Bashir et al. 2021 [12]

Gestational diabetes for treatment trials

A Core Outcome Set

11a

Five round Delphi survey and consensus meetings

Agreement by three-quarters of those present

Researchers and clinicians from Qatar, North America, Europe, and Australiab

Not stated

N

1790

Some details not reported

 Meissner et al. 2021 [31]

Pregnancy registries in rheumatology

A Core data set for registries

51a

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

> 70% scored as critically important in Delphi and > 50% of votes in meeting

Multidisciplinary stakeholders from 14 different countriesb

64, 88%, 12

N

1710

Some details not reported

 Duffy et al. 2020 [19]

Pre-eclampsia research

A Core Outcome Set

22a

A Three-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group

Patients, clinicians, researchers from 56 nations

432, 63%,11

Ye

588

Good

 Egan et al. 2020 [20]

Gestational diabetes mellitus prevention and treatment

A Core Outcome Set

14

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group and ≥ 70% voted ‘yes in meeting

Patient representatives, researchers and clinicians from 27 countries

173f, 59%, 23

Ye

686

Good

 Jansen et al. 2020 [27]

Hyperemesis gravidarum research

A Core Outcome Set

24

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group

Patient representatives, researchers and clinicians from 22 countries

277, 45%,20

N

805

Good

 Bogdanet et al. 2019 [14]

Follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes

A Core Outcome Set

9

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d

Patients, clinicians, researchers, policy makers and others from 33 nations

835, 20%, 20

Ye

1031

Good

 Bunch et al. 2018 ( [16]

Monitor the quality of maternity care

Developing a set of consensus indicators

14

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d

Service designers, providers and users from Englandb

101, 71%, 19

N

Some details not reportedg

 Nijagal et al. 2018 [32]

Pregnancy and childbirth

Standardized outcome measures

23

A series of nine teleconferences, incorporating a modified Delphi process

Outcome domains thought to be “critical” (7–9) by at least 70%

Consumer representatives and international experts, researchers and patient advocacy from 8 nations

21, 73%, NA

N

875

Some details not reported

 Egan et al. 2017 [21]

Pre-pregnancy care for women with pregestational diabetes

A Core Outcome Set

17

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d

Clinicians’ patient’s policy makers, researchers, advocates on behalf of those with diabetes and others from 24 nations

151f, 67%, 14

Ye

692

Good

 Al Wattar et al. 2016 [11]

Epilepsy in pregnancy

A Core Outcome Set

31

A three-round Delphi survey and consultation meetingi

70%/ 15%d (used a 5-point scale)

Healthcare professionals, and patient representatives from UK.b

99f, 49%, 15

Yh

393

Good

 Rogozinska et al. 2016 [34]

The effects of diet and lifestyle in pregnancy

Composite outcomes for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis

Maternal: 6 Neonatal: 4

A two-round Delphi survey

Considered to be critically important by the (score > 7) by the panel

Researchers from the International Weight Management in Pregnancy collaborative network from 11 nationsb

26, 96%, NA

N

Significant details not reported

 van ʼt Hooft et al. 2016 [37]

Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth

A Core Outcome Set

13

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group

Parents, clinicians, and researcher from 25 nations

228, 76%, 29

Yh

603

Good

 Fong et al. 2014 [23]

Management of late-onset pre-eclampsia

Maternal and neonatal composite outcomes

Maternal: 7 Neonatal: 3

A two-round Delphi survey

A median score of ≤4 and indicated consensus (IQR ≤2) for evaluation in the third stage. (5-point scale)

Practising senior clinicians and clinical academics from the United Kingdomb

44, 90% maternal outcomes

75% neonatal outcomes, NA

N

716

Significant details not reported

 Saldanha et al. 2013 [35]

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Identify research needs, including which outcomes to measure, from a systematic review

Maternal: 17 Neonatal:13

Delphi method

Not specified

Clinicians, primary researchers, research funders, insurers, and patients or patient representatives from 1 nation

9

N

Significant details not reported

 Bennett et al. 2012 [13]

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Identify research needs, including which outcomes to measure

Medication: 8 Delivery:8

One- survey

Appearing in the top 3 list of two or more of the nine stakeholders

Clinical expertsb

20, NA, NA

N

527

Significant details not reported

 Mehra et al. 2012 [30]

Weight management interventions in pregnancy

Prioritisation of outcomes

Presents the top 5

A two-round Delphi survey

Not enough information provided

20 Consultants from 2 nationsb

20 participants

N

Significant details not reported

 Devane et al. 2007 [17]

Evaluating maternity care

A Core Outcome Set

48

A three-round Delphi survey

Both a mean above the overall group mean for all outcomes combined and rated 4–5 by at least 70%

Healthcare professionals and patients from 28 nations.

320, 48%, NA

N

108

Some details not reportedg

Misscarriage, abortion and stillbirth

 Kim et al. 2021 828)

Interventions to prevent stillbirth

A Core Outcome Set

11

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

70%/ 15%d

Clinicians, researchers and parents

129f 69%, 20

Yh

982

Some details not reported

 Fiala et al. 2018 [22]

First trimester medical termination of pregnancy

Definitions of outcomes

NA

Consensus meeting

Not specified

Clinicians, researchers and members of the pharmaceutical industry from Europeb

Number of participants not clearly stated

N

Significant details not reportedg

Mental Health

 Hellberg et al. 2021 [26]

Treatment studies of perinatal depression

A Core Outcome Set

9

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group

Clinicians, researchers and patients from 13 countries

222, 55%,13

Y

1421

Goodj

Labour and delivery and complications

 Gachon et al. 2021 [24]

Mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery

A Core Outcome Set for a one-year observational French study

51 outcomes

63 variables

A three-round Delphi surveyi

at least 50% of respondents considered the item as essential

Obstetricians and women in the community

Clinicians: 109, 37%, NA

Women: 24, 63%, NA

N

Some details not reportedg

 Briscoe et al. 2019 [15]

Cesarean deliveries with infectious morbidity outcomes

A Core Outcome Set

6

A two-round Delphi survey

Majority of respondents

Systematic review authorsb

41, 34%, NA

N

763

Significant details not reported

 Dos Santos et al. 2018 [18]

Induction of labour

A Core Outcome Set

28

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d

Midwives, obstetricians, neonatologists, and women’s representatives

159, 45%, 20

Yh

695

Good

 Meher et al. 2019 [29]

Prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage

Two Core Outcome Sets

Prevention: 9

Treatment: 12

A two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d in each stakeholder group

Healthcare professionals and women’s representatives from 36 nations

Prevention: 205, 74%, 36

Treatment: 197, 73%, 36

Yh

706

Good

Fetal / neonatal

 Healy et al. 2019 [25]

Prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction

A Core Outcome Set

22

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting

70%/ 15%d

Healthcare providers, researchers/academics, members of the public from 36 nations

238, 45%, not specified

Ye

689

Good

 Perry et al. 2019 [33]

Treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

A Core Outcome Set

12

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

70%/ 15%d

Healthcare professionals, researchers and patients or relatives of patients from 29 nations

103f, 85%, 16

Ye

1392

Good

 Townsend et al. 2019 [36]

Management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins.

A Core Outcome Set

11

A three-round Delphi survey and consensus meetingc

A median score of 8 after the third round were taken forwards for discussion

Clinicians, obstetricians, fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, and midwives, researchers, and parents or patients from 23 nations.

102f, 86%, 19

Ye

998

Good

  1. aAlso includes how to measure the selected outcomes in the same paper or in an additional publication
  2. bNo or limited patient involvement
  3. cUsing the modified nominal group technique
  4. dAn outcome was included in the COS if at least 70% of participants scored the outcome as critically important (usually 7–9) and < 15% to score the outcome as not important (usually 1–3)
  5. eProtocol published as a scientific paper
  6. fDoes not specify the number of non-responders from the first survey
  7. gNo systematic review of outcomes done prior to outcome prioritization/COS development
  8. hMention protocol in paper but no reference is given
  9. iUses separate surveys for patients
  10. jStudy done by the authors of current publication