Skip to main content

Table 2 Frequency of shared decision making, patient knowledge, and making an informed, patient-centered decision comparing routine care vs. patient decision aid groups

From: Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study

Outcome measures

Routine care

Patient decision aid

P-value4

N = 50

N = 50

Primary outcomes:

Shared Decision Making Process (SDMP) score, median (IQR)b.c (n = 99)

3 (2 to 4)

3 (2.5 to 4)

0.46

Patient knowledged

 Mean score (SD)

49.5 (23.41)

78.5 (23.15)

< 0.001

 Score ≥ 75%, n(%)

16 (32.0)

36 (72.0)

< 0.001

Informed, patient-centered (IPC) decision on delivery admissiona

11/42 (26.1)

28/47 (59.6)

0.002

Secondary outcomes:

3Satisfaction

  Amount of information about birth options

   Much less / a little less than wanted

15 (30.0)

11 (22.0)

0.36

   About right/ more than wanted

35 (70.0)

39 (78.0)

 

  Clarity of information about birth options

   Poor / Fair

14 (28.0)

4 (8.0)

0.02

   Good / Very Good

27 (54.0)

30 (60.0)

   Excellent

9 (18.0)

16 (32.0)

 

  Balanced information about birth options

   Strongly / slightly favors vaginal birth

15 (30.0)

14 (28.0)

0.07

   Balanced

22 (44.0)

31 (62.0)

   Slightly / strongly favors repeat cesarean

13 (26.0)

5 (10.0)

 

  Values

   Know in advance the delivery date (1–11), mean (SD)

5.0 (3.87)

6.2 (3.44)

0.09

   Avoid a cesarean delivery (1–11), mean (SD)

6.1 (3.66)

6.1 (3.89)

0.93

   Little pain as possible during delivery (1–11), mean, (SD), n = 99

6.2 (3.12)

6.85 (2.64)

0.29

   Return to usual activities quickly after birth (0–10), mean (SD)

7.9 (2.57)

7.7 (2.67)

0.65

   Have a vaginal birth (0–10), mean (SD)

6.0 (3.56)

5.7 (3.56)

0.69

  1. a N = 89 participants
  2. bThe Shared Decision Making Process Score assessed the clinician explaining birth options, including reasons for TOLAC and planned repeat cesarean delivery, and eliciting patient desires about mode of delivery
  3. cRespondents received 1 point for each of the following responses: discussed pros = some or a lot, discussed cons = some or a lot, asked preference = yes, and choices explained = yes
  4. dKnowledge assessed women’s knowledge of postoperative recovery, probability of repeat cesarean after TOLAC, and risk and implications of uterine rupture
  5. 4P-value compares routine care vs. patient decision aid groups (chi-square for categorical variables and Student’s T-test for continuous variables)