Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of GWG among women of different pre-pregnancy BMI and fetal sex on GDM development defined by 1999 WHO criteria

From: Comparative epidemiology of gestational diabetes in ethnic Chinese from Shanghai birth cohort and growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes cohort

GDM

Shanghai Birth cohort

Unadjusted

GUSTO Birth Cohort

Unadjusted

Shanghai Birth cohort

Adjusted

GUSTO Birth Cohort

Adjusted

P-value*

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

Maternal age

1.08(1.03–1.14)

0.003

1.09(1.04–1.14)

< 0.001

1.1(1.0-1.2)

0.014

1.08(1.03–1.13)

0.003

1.000

GWG at early pregnancy (z score)

0.86(0.70–1.05)

0.133

1.2(1.0-1.5)

0.085

0.69(0.44–1.08)

0.106

1.2(0.8–1.7)

0.444

0.088

Pre-pregnancy BMI

         

< 18.5

0.72(0.37–1.39)

0.324

0.93(0.49–1.80)

0.838

0.85(0.38–1.90)

0.687

1.0(0.5–2.1)

0.911

0.785

≥ 18.5 to < 23

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

  

≥ 23 to < 27.5

1.8(1.2–2.9)

0.009

1.9(1.1-3.0)

0.014

2.3(1.3–3.9)

0.004

1.7(1.0-2.9)

0.047

0.124

≥ 27.5

2.0(0.9–4.5)

0.088

3.7(1.8–7.3)

< 0.001

1.9(0.7–5.5)

0.239

3.7(1.8–7.8)

< 0.001

0.005

Alcohol consumption

5.1(0.3–82.0)

0.251

0.67(0.19–2.32)

0.526

8.7(0.5-144.1)

0.130

0.75(0.21–2.69)

0.656

< 0.001

Family history of diabetes

1.6(0.8-3.0)

0.165

1.0(0.6–1.6)

0.981

0.99(0.48–2.04)

0.967

0.84(0.50–1.41)

0.512

0.717

Family history of hypertension

1.6(1.0-2.4)

0.032

0.78(0.53–1.16)

0.223

1.5(0.9–2.5)

0.100

0.69(0.43–1.08)

0.103

0.021

Current or ever smoker

1.1(0.4–3.4)

0.842

0.79(0.39–1.61)

0.515

1.8(0.4-7.0)

0.421

1.1(0.5–2.3)

0.880

0.398

Parous

1.0(0.5–1.8)

1.000

1.2(0.8–1.7)

0.470

0.68(0.31–1.50)

0.338

1.0(0.7–1.6)

0.880

0.481

Male fetus

1.1(0.7–1.7)

0.633

1.1(0.7–1.6)

0.781

1.1(0.7–1.7)

0.783

1.0(0.7–1.6)

0.868

0.747

  1. Adjusted for maternal age, GWG at early pregnancy, pre-pregnancy BMI group, alcohol consumption, family history of diabetes, family history of hypertension, smoking status, parity, fetal sex
  2. In the adjusted model, 74.4 % of SBC subjects (546 out of 734) were used, 82.9 % of GUSTO subjects (561 out of 677) were used
  3. *P value for the difference between the two cohorts in the adjusted model
  4. Interaction between GWG and pre pregnancy BMI group and fetal sex were included in the model but not significant
  5. Overall interaction for GWG and pre pregnancy BMI group: p = 0.737 for SBC, p = 0.088 for GUSTO
  6. Interaction for GWG and fetal sex: p = 0.254 for SBC, p = 0.674 for GUSTO