Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between risk factors and GDM defined by 1999 WHO criteria in SBC and GUSTO cohort

From: Comparative epidemiology of gestational diabetes in ethnic Chinese from Shanghai birth cohort and growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes cohort

GDM

Shanghai Birth cohort

Unadjusted

GUSTO Birth Cohort

Unadjusted

Shanghai Birth cohort

Adjusted

GUSTO Birth Cohort

Adjusted

P-value*

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

OR (95 % CI)

P-value

OR (95 % CI)

P- value

OR (95 % CI)

P- value

Maternal age

1.08(1.03–1.14)

0.003

1.09(1.04–1.14)

< 0.001

1.1(1.0-1.2)

0.020

1.09(1.03–1.14)

0.001

1.000

Pre-pregnancy BMI

1.08(1.03–1.15)

0.005

1.11(1.05–1.17)

< 0.001

1.1(1.0-1.2)

0.028

1.1(1.0-1.2)

0.002

1.000

GWG at early pregnancy (z score)

         

<-1

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

  

-1 to 1

0.96(0.52–1.78)

0.894

1.6(0.8–3.2)

0.208

1.0(0.5–2.2)

0.955

1.7(0.8–3.5)

0.175

0.189

> 1

0.97(0.44–2.13)

0.942

1.8(0.8–4.2)

0.173

0.88(0.34–2.25)

0.786

1.7(0.7-4.0)

0.258

0.211

Alcohol consumption

5.1(0.3–82.0)

0.251

0.67(0.19–2.32)

0.526

8.8(0.5-144.8)

0.128

0.73(0.20–2.64)

0.632

< 0.001

Family history of diabetes

1.6(0.8-3.0)

0.165

1.0(0.6–1.6)

0.981

1.0(0.5–2.1)

0.996

0.86(0.52–1.43)

0.566

0.755

Family history of hypertension

1.6(1.0-2.4)

0.032

0.78(0.53–1.16)

0.223

1.5(0.9–2.5)

0.092

0.67(0.43–1.04)

0.076

0.016

Current or ever smoker

1.1(0.4–3.4)

0.842

0.79(0.39–1.61)

0.515

1.6(0.4-6.0)

0.509

1.1(0.5–2.3)

0.858

0.528

Parous

1.0(0.5–1.8)

1.000

1.2(0.8–1.7)

0.470

0.74(0.34–1.61)

0.443

0.97(0.64–1.49)

0.893

0.610

Male fetus

1.1(0.7–1.7)

0.633

1.1(0.7–1.6)

0.781

1.1(0.7–1.7)

0.801

1.1(0.7–1.6)

0.744

1.000

  1. Adjusted for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, GWG at early pregnancy (z score), alcohol consumption, family history of diabetes, family history of hypertension, smoking status, parity, fetal sex
  2. In the adjusted model, 74.4 % of SBC subjects (546 out of 734) were used, 82.9 % of GUSTO subjects (561 out of 677) were used
  3. *P value for the difference between the two cohorts in the adjusted model