Skip to main content

Table 3 Labour events and outcomes of women in the two groups

From: Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study

Variables

Use of EA

(n = 1722)

No use of EA

(n = 1154)

P value

Intrapartum CD

275 (16.0)

308 (26.7)

< 0.001*

Assisted vaginal delivery

167 (9.7)

99 (8.6)

0.310

Length of first stage of labour (min)

629 ± 208

582 ± 246

0.076

Length of second stage of labour (min)

40.2 ± 27.1

37.4 ± 23.6

0.216

PROM

573 (33.3)

405 (35.1)

0.313

Augmentation with amniotomy

919 (53.4)

488 (42.3)

< 0.001*

Augmentation with oxytocin

1369 (79.5)

773 (67.0)

< 0.001*

Intrapartum fever (> 38 °C)

401 (23.3)

98 (8.5)

< 0.001*

VAS pain score (mm)

 Baseline

80.5 [77, 90]

78.7 [70, 83]

0.342

 1 h after EA

20.9 [10, 30]

–

–

 2 h after EA

33.5 [20, 50]

–

–

 3 h after EA

39.8 [30, 50]

–

–

Satisfaction score of EA (mm)

90 [87.5, 100]

–

–

Blood loss (ml)

300 [300, 375]

300 [300, 300]

0.395

Hospital stays (d)

5 [4, 6]

5 [4, 6]

0.238

Birthweight (g)

  < 2500

5 (0.3)

7 (0.6)

0.462

 2500–4000

1605 (93.2)

1064 (92.2)

  ≥ 4000

112 (6.5)

82 (7.1)

Apgar < 7 at 1 min

29 (1.7)

12 (1.0)

0.153

Apgar < 7 at 5 min

6 (0.4)

3 (0.3)

0.677

Cervical dilation at the time of intrapartum CD (cm)

(n = 275)

(n = 308)

 

  ≤ 2

23 (8.4)

275 (89.3)

< 0.001*

 3–4

175 (63.6)

30 (9.7)

  ≥ 5

77 (28.0)

3 (1.0)

  1. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, n (%), or median [interquartile range]
  2. Abbreviations: EA epidural analgesia, CD caesarean delivery, PROM premature rupture of membranes, VAS visual analogue scale
  3. *P value< 0.05