Skip to main content

Table 1 Bivariate analysis of selected characteristics with herbal medicine use during pregnancy or delivery in Tabora, Tanzania

From: Understanding forgotten exposures towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3: a cross‐sectional study on herbal medicine use during pregnancy or delivery in Tanzania

Characteristic

Total

Herbal use

Number (%)

Chi-square, p-value*

Age group (years)

  

1.62, 0.431

 16-25

83

46 (55.4)

 

 26-35

142

88 (62.0)

 

 36+

115

74 (64.3)

 

Marital status

  

0.67, 0.717

 Never in union

25

14 (56.0)

 

 Currently in union

285

174 (61.1)

 

 Previously in union

30

20 (66.7)

 

Education level

  

2.86, 0.239

 None/prim incomplete

87

50 (57.5)

 

 Primary complete

175

104 (59.4)

 

 Secondary and above

78

54 (69.2)

 

Occupation of mother

  

3.63, 0.163

 Peasant/housewife

177

108 (61.0)

 

 Self-employed

127

73 (57.5)

 

 Formerly employed

36

27 (75.0)

 

Occupation of spousea

  

4.59, 0.101

 Peasant

159

103 (64.8)

 

 Self employed

91

59 (64.8)

 

 Formerly employed

78

40 (51.3)

 

Distance to nearest facility (km)

  

5.35, 0.021

 > 5

85

61 (71.8)

 

 ≤ 5

255

147 (57.6)

 

No. of ANC visits

  

6.47, 0.011

 < 4 visits

199

133 (68.8)

 

 ≥ 4 visits

141

75 (53.2)

 

Perceived availability of HMs

  

1.51, 0.219

 Easily available

57

39 (68.4)

 

 Not easily available

283

169 (59.7)

 

Perceived safety of HMs

  

11.74, <0.01

 Safe

83

64 (77.1)

 

 Not safe

257

144 (56.0)

 

Health care provider’s stance towards use of HMs

  

13.15, < 0.01

 Did not discourage

131

96 (73.3)

 

 Discouraged use

209

112 (53.6)

 
  1. *Pearson’s chi-square
  2. a 12 missing values