Skip to main content

Table 4 Indications for CS among women in group 1

From: Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas: the impact of the quality improvement course

IndicationAbsolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2014Absolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2016p valueAbsolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2014Absolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2016p value
FC (without oxytocin)15.9 54/34017.3 53/294p = 0.4721.5 54/35021.4 53/3526p = 0.101
Dystocia74.1252/34075.5225/294p = 0.4847.2252/35026.3225/3526p = 0.174
CCD without oxytocin10.0 34/34010.5 31/294p = 0.8181.0 34/35020.9 31/3526p = 0.689
CCD with oxytocin20.0 68/34016.0 47/294p = 0.192.9 68/35021.3 47/3526p = 0.044
ICD without oxytocin6.2 21/3407.1 21/294p = 0.6240.6 21/35020.6 21/3526p = 0.984
ICD with oxytocin27.9 95/34033.0100/294p = 0.0992.7 95/35022.8100/3526p = 0.757
FC with oxytocina10.0 34/3408.8 26/294p = 0.6171.0 34/35020.7 26/3526p = 0.289
Others10.0 34/3407.1 22/294p = 0.2671.0 34/35020.6 22/3526p = 0.101
Total   9.7340/35028.5300/3526p = 0.08
  1. a“FC with oxytocin” was attributed to “dystocia” because the reason why oxytocin was administered was dystocia