Skip to main content

Table 4 Indications for CS among women in group 1

From: Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas: the impact of the quality improvement course

Indication

Absolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2014

Absolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2016

p value

Absolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2014

Absolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2016

p value

FC (without oxytocin)

15.9 54/340

17.3 53/294

p = 0.472

1.5 54/3502

1.4 53/3526

p = 0.101

Dystocia

74.1252/340

75.5225/294

p = 0.484

7.2252/3502

6.3225/3526

p = 0.174

CCD without oxytocin

10.0 34/340

10.5 31/294

p = 0.818

1.0 34/3502

0.9 31/3526

p = 0.689

CCD with oxytocin

20.0 68/340

16.0 47/294

p = 0.19

2.9 68/3502

1.3 47/3526

p = 0.044

ICD without oxytocin

6.2 21/340

7.1 21/294

p = 0.624

0.6 21/3502

0.6 21/3526

p = 0.984

ICD with oxytocin

27.9 95/340

33.0100/294

p = 0.099

2.7 95/3502

2.8100/3526

p = 0.757

FC with oxytocina

10.0 34/340

8.8 26/294

p = 0.617

1.0 34/3502

0.7 26/3526

p = 0.289

Others

10.0 34/340

7.1 22/294

p = 0.267

1.0 34/3502

0.6 22/3526

p = 0.101

Total

   

9.7340/3502

8.5300/3526

p = 0.08

  1. a“FC with oxytocin” was attributed to “dystocia” because the reason why oxytocin was administered was dystocia