Table 5 Multiple stepwise linear regression for intuitive grief (n = 210)

  Ultrasound viewed during pregnancy

1.5

(−0.01–3.03)

.77

.15

.05

  Ultrasound not viewed during pregnancy

Ref

–

–

–

–

  Other

1.17

(−0.12–2.35)

.60

−.13

.05

  Australian

Ref

–

–

–

–

PAAS Quality of Attachment subscale

.10

(−0.02–0.22)

.06

.12

.09

Age at loss (in years)

.07

(−0.02–0.16)

.05

.07

.10

Number of surviving children at loss

−.20

(−0.67–0.27)

.24

−.05

.40

Agreement to the statement: “My role following the loss was to support my partner and family”

−.37

(−0.90–0.15)

.27

−.08

.16

CSS total score

.06

(0.4 – −0.01)

.04

.15

.10

Extent of acknowledgement for grief from family

.26

(−0.24–0.76)

.26

.11

.31

CMNI Self-Reliance subscale

−.14

(−0.29–0.02)

.08

−.12

.08

MRNI Toughness subscale

−.05

(−0.17–0.06)

.06

−.07

.37

  Employment leave offered

4.98

(−1.2–11.16)

3.16

.73

.11

  Employment leave not offered

4.93

(−1.3–11.19)

3.19

.62

.12

  Did not inform employer of loss

Ref

–

–

–

–

  Other supports offered

−3.38

(−9.72–2.95)

3.23

−.57

.29

  Other supports not offered

−3.78

(−10.19–2.63)

3.27

−.67

.25

 Did not inform employer of loss

Ref

–

–

–

–

Extent of acknowledgement from healthcare professionals

−.46

(−0.84 – −0.08)

.20

−.18

.02