Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of risks of adverse maternal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians, Ontario, Canada, April 1st, 2015-March 31st, 2017 (N = 69,734)

From: Comparison of adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario

Maternal Outcomes

Asian

Caucasian

(reference)

Adjusted RR (95% CI)

Adjusted RD (95%CI)

n

%

n

%

Gestational diabetes

9793

13.38

9077

5.53

2.71 (2.68, 2.74)

1.00 (0.97, 1.03)

Gestational hypertension

2012

2.75

6461

3.94

0.93 (0.88, 0.98)

−0.07 (− 0.12, − 0.02)

Preeclampsia

1945

2.66

7045

4.29

0.84 (0.78, 0.89)

−0.18 (− 0.23, − 0.13)

Placental previa

700

0.96

1097

0.67

1.30 (1.21, 1.40)

0.26 (0.17, 0.36)

Preterm birth (< 37 weeks)

5070

6.93

10,419

6.35

1.23 (1.20, 1.27)

0.21 (0.17, 0.24)

Preterm birth (< 34 weeks)

1376

1.88

2603

1.59

1.37 (1.29, 1.44)

0.31 (0.24, 0.38)

Preterm birth (< 32 weeks)

901

1.23

1582

0.96

1.49 (1.39, 1.58)

0.40 (0.30, 0.49)

Spontaneous preterm birth

1994

2.72

4103

2.50

1.25 (1.20, 1.31)

0.23 (0.17, 0.28)

Cesarean section

21,694

29.64

46,416

28.30

1.03 (1.01, 1.05)

0.03 (0.01, 0.05)

 Elective cesarean section

11,542

15.77

24,968

15.22

0.91 (0.89, 0.94)

−0.09 (−0.11, −0.07)

 Emergency cesarean section

10,146

13.86

21,443

13.07

1.22 (1.20, 1.25)

0.20 (0.18, 0.22)

Assisted vaginal delivery

8521

11.64

14,601

8.90

1.29 (1.26, 1.31)

0.25 (0.23, 0.28)

Episiotomy

10,443

14.27

14,552

8.87

1.40 (1.38, 1.43)

0.34 (0.31, 0.36)

3rd and 4th degree perineal tears

2756

4.19

3836

2.65

1.57 (1.52, 1.62)

0.45 (0.40, 0.50)

  1. RR relative risk, CI confidence interval
  2. 1. Generalized estimating equations with a log link function and a poisson distribution were used to estimate the relative risks of the outcomes.
  3. 2. Covariates included in the adjusted models for each outcome were selected covariates that showed univariate association of P < 0.05 with both the exposure and the outcome were included in the adjusted model. The covariate for each outcome was fit separately
  4. 3. A fully conditional specification method was used to impute missing values, assuming a joint distribution for all variables. Five imputed datasets were created