Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias assessment for the included studies, N = 14

From: Immediate versus delayed induction of labour in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S.No

Author and year

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of the participants

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting of outcome

1.

Bhageerathy et al. 2016 [22]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

2.

Boers et al. 2010 [15]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

3.

Broekhuijsen et al. 2015 [23]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

4.

Chappell et al. 2019 [24]

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

5.

Duvekot et al. 2015 [25]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

6.

GRIT study group 2013 [26]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

7.

Hamed et al. 2014 [16]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

8.

Koopmans et al. 2009 [27]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

9.

Owens et al. 2014 [28]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

10.

Majeed et al. 2014 [29]

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

High risk

11.

Mesbah EMM 2003 [30]

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Low risk

12.

Odendaal HJ et al. 1990 [32]

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

13.

Sibai BM et al. 1994 [33]

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

14.

Vigil De Gracia et al. 2013 [31]

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk