Skip to main content

Table 5 Predictors of knowledge of danger signs of men with their coefficients of the binomial regression model

From: A cross-sectional study of the role of men and the knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy in southern Mozambique

Variables

Poor knowledge of danger signs (0 or 1)

Some Knowledge (2 or more)

Beta coefficient

P-Value

% (n)

% (n)

  

Education

 No

31.58(6)

68.42(13)

REF

REF

 Primary Level

39.02(80)

60.98(125)

−0.32

0.57

 Secondary Level

43.75(7)

56.25(9)

−0.31

0.68

 Higher

23.08(3)

76.92(10)

−0.24

0.29

Age

 18–21

33.33(3)

66.67(6)

REF

REF

 21–25

44.44(12)

55.56(15)

−1.02

0.23

 25–35

38.94(44)

61.06(69)

−0.55

0.48

 > 35

35.58(37)

64.42(67)

−0.63

0.43

Marital Status

 Single

37.14(13)

62.86(22)

REF

REF

 In relationship

38.07(83)

61.93(135)

−0.13

0.76

Place of last delivery

 Hospital

37.92(91)

62.08(149)

REF

REF

 At home

38.46(5)

61.54(8)

0.06

0.92

Number of ANC visits

 0 ANCs

37.50(3)

62.50(5)

REF

REF

 < 4 ANCs

28.57(10)

71.43(25)

0.24

0.78

 > =4 ANCs

29.36(32)

70.64(77)

0.13

0.87

 Don’t know

50.50(51)

49.50(50)

−0.58

0.47

Communication regarding ANC*

 No

53.09(43)

46.91(38)

REF

REF

 Yes

30.81(53)

69.19(119)

0.73

0.01

Male attendance last pregnancy

 No

43.23(67)

56.77(88)

REF

REF

 Yes

29.59(29)

70.41(69)

0.32

0.29

Number of children alive

 0–2

32.35(11)

67.65(23)

REF

REF

 3–5

38.51(62)

61.49(99)

−0.30

0.49

 > 5

39.66(23)

60.34(35)

− 0.39

0.43

  1. Levels of significance:. = p < 0.1; * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01