Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies

From: Spiral artery blood flow during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Domain

Items for consideration

Alouini (ref. [20])

Coppens (ref. [21])

Deurloo (ref. [2])

Deurloo (ref. [22])

Hsieh (ref. [23])

Kurjak (ref. [24])

Kurjak (ref. [25])

Mäkikallio (ref. [26])

Mäkikallio (ref. [27])

Matijevic (ref. [9])

Ozkan (ref. [15])

Ozkaya (ref. [28])

Study participation

Adequate description of participants’ characteristics

            

• Parity or gravidity

–

–

–

+

+

–

–

+

–

–

–

+

• Health or comorbidities of participants

–

–

+

+

+

–

+

+

–

–

–

–

• Clear reporting of weeks amenorrhea

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

• Ethnicity

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

• Age

–

–

+

+

+

–

+

+

+

+

+

+

• Non-pregnant weight/BMI

–

–

+

+

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

• Use of medication or supplements

–

–

–

–

–

–

+

–

–

–

–

–

Adequate description of participant recruitment

–

–

+

+

+

–

+

–

+

+

+

+

Adequate description of inclusion and exclusion criteria

–

–

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

–

+

+

Study attrition

Reasons for loss to follow-up/drop-out are provided

–

+

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Adequate description of participants lost to follow-up/ differences between participants who completed and drop-outs

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Outcome measurement

Method of measurement is adequately valid and reliable

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

The methods and setting are the same for all study participants and throughout follow up

+

+

+

+

+

–

+

+

+

+

+

+

Data reporting

Data is extractable as mean with standard deviation for analysis

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Study design

Study used a longitudinal study design

–

+

+

+

+

+

–

+

+

–

–

–

Multiple (> 2) longitudinal pregnant measurements during pregnancy of the variable

?

+

+

+

+

+

?

+

+

?

?

?

Assessment of intra- and/or inter-observer variation is performed

–

–

+

+

–

–

–

+

+

–

–

–

Count (+)

4

7

12

13

11

5

9

11

10

6

7

8

Score %

24

41

71

76

65

29

53

65

59

35

41

47

Quality

Low

Medium

High

High

High

Low

Medium

High

Medium

Low

Medium

Medium

  1. Ref. reference number