Skip to main content

Table 2 Midwives’ practices and comfort in undertaking psychosocial assessment

From: Opening the door: midwives’ perceptions of two models of psychosocial assessment in pregnancy- a mixed methods study

 

Usual Care

PIPA condition

Result

Q1. Comfort with discussing psychosocial issues with pregnant women

N = 25

n = 27

 

 Very/somewhat comfortable

24 (96%)

27 (93%)

ns

 Very/somewhat uncomfortable

1 (4%)

2 (7%)

Q2. Reliance on programmed wording vs. own wording

N = 25

n = 27

 

 Entirely/mostly rely on programmed wording

3 (12%)

12 (44%)

χ2 = 5.17, p = .023, φ = −.36

 Entirely rely on own wording

22 (88%)

15 (56%)

Q3. Comfort using the questions that appear onscreen

N = 26

n = 26

 

 Very/somewhat comfortable

23 (89%)

26 (100%)

ns

 Somewhat/Very uncomfortable

3 (12%)a

0

Q4. Appropriateness of psychosocial screen at booking rather than subsequent visit

N = 26

n = 27

 

 Very/somewhat appropriate

23 (89%)

27 (100%)

ns

 Somewhat/Very inappropriate

3 (12%)a

0

 

Q5. Ease with which psychosocial assessment could be completed on computer

N = 26

n = 27

 

 Very/somewhat easy

26 (100%)

27 (100%)

ns

 Somewhat/Very difficult

0

0

Q6. Clarity with which the psychosocial questions identify key psychosocial issues

N = 26

n = 26

 

 Very/somewhat clearly

22 (85%)

26 (100%)

ns

 Not very clearly

4 (15%)

0

Q7. Comfort providing feedback from psychosocial assessment to women with more complex issues (e..g DV, substance use, child protection services, serious mental health problems)

N = 26

n = 27

 

 Very/somewhat comfortable

22 (85%)

22 (82%)

ns

 Somewhat/Very uncomfortable

4 (15%)

5 (19%)a

Q8. Confidence in discussing referral options for women with complex issues

N = 26

n = 26

 

 Very/somewhat confident

21 (81%)

24 (92%)

ns

 Not very confident

5 (19%)

2 (8%)

Q9. How often EPDS results disussed with women in your care

Total elevated score

N = 26

N = 27

 

  Most or all of the time

25 (96%)

23 (85%)

ns

  Some of the time

1 (4%)

3 (11%)

 

  Hardly ever or never

0

1 (4%)

 

When score is not elevated

N = 26

N = 27

 

  Most or all of the time

16 (62%)

19 (70%)

ns

  Some of the time

9 (35%)

6 (22%)

 

  Hardly ever or never

1 (4%)a

2 (7%)a

 

Positive Q10 (thoughts of self harm)

N = 25

N = 26

 

  Most or all of the time

24 (96%)

23 (89%)

ns

  Some of the time

1 (4%)

1 (4%)

 

  Hardly ever or never

0

2 (8%)a

 

Q10. Confidence in discussing positive responses to Q10 (thoughts of self harm)

N = 26

N = 25

 

 Very/somewhat confident

21 (81%)

21 (84%)

ns

 Not very confident/Not confident at all

5 (19%)

4 (16%)

Q11. Helpfulness of onscreen action prompt/s

N = 26

N = 26

 

 Very/somewhat helpful

11 (42%)

26 (100%)

χ2 = 18.36, p < .001, φ = −.64

 Somewhat/Very unhelpful

15 (58%)

0

Q12. How often do you follow these messages?

N = 25

N = 26

 

 Most of the time

8 (32%)

18 (69%)

χ2 = 5.66, p < .017, φ = −.37

 Some of the time/Hardly ever or never

17 (68%)

8 (31%)

Q 13. In general, does the booking in time allocation allow for adequate psychosocial assessment?

N = 26

n = 26

 

 Yes there is more than enough time/ Yes there is usually the right amount of time

14 (54%)

14 (54%)

ns

 Yes but there is barely enough time/No usually there isn’t enough time

12 (46%)

12 (46%)

ns

Q 14. How clinically useful do you find the Psychosocial Summary Report?

N = 24

N = 27

 

 Very/somewhat useful

21 (88%)

24 (89%)

ns

 Not very useful/Not useful at all

3 (13%)a

3 (11%)

Q15. At subsequent visits, how often do you refer to the Psychosocial Summary Reports that is [generated] at booking?

N = 24

N = 26

 

 Most of the time

7 (29%)

7 (27%)

ns

 Some of the time

12 (50%)

16 (62%)

 Hardly ever or never

5 (21%)

3 (12%)a

  1. *Does not total 100% due to rounding