Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of clinical data between the growth-hormone (GH)-treated and control groups

From: Does growth hormone supplementation improve oocyte competence and IVF outcomes in patients with poor embryonic development? A randomized controlled trial

 

GH (n = 107)

Control (n = 51)

P-value

RR (95% CI)

Implantation rate (%)

63/175 (36.00%)

15/84 (17.86%)

0.005

2.016 (1.224–3.322)

Clinical pregnancy rate/cycle start (%)

47/107 (43.93%)

10/51 (19.61%)

0.005

2.240 (1.235–4.064)

Clinical pregnancy rate/ET (%)

47/91 (51.65%)

10/45 (22.22%)

0.002

2.324 (1.299–4.158)

Early miscarriage rate/cycle start (%)

3/107 (2.80%)

1/51 (2.00%)

1

 

Early miscarriage rate//ET (%)

3/91 (3.30%)

1/45 (2.22%)

1

 

Fresh ET rate (%)

69/91 (75.82%)

37/45 (82.22%)

0.531

 

Fresh ET clinical pregnancy rate (%)

37/69 (53.62%)

8/37 (21.62%)

0.003

2.480 (1.293–4.758)

Fresh ET ongoing pregnancy rate (%)

34/69 (49.28%)

7/37 (18.92%)

0.004

 

Fresh ET live birth rate (%)

34/69 (49.28%)

7/37 (18.92%)

0.004

2.605 (1.282–5.291)

Frozen ET rate(%)

22/91 (24.18%)

8/45 (17.78%)

0.531

 

Frozen ET clinical pregnancy rate (%)

10/22 (45.45%)

2/8 (25.00%)

0.555

 

Frozen ET ongoing pregnancy rate (%)

10/22 (45.45%)

2/8 (25.00%)

0.555

 

Frozen ET live birth rate (%)

10/22 (45.45%)

2/8 (25.00%)

0.555

1.818 (0.503–6.569)

Ongoing pregnancy rate /cycle start (%)

44/107 (41.12%)

9/51 (17.65%)

0.006

 

Ongoing pregnancy rate /ET (%)

44/91 (48.35%)

9/45 (20.00%)

0.003

 

Live birth rate/cycle start (%)

44/107 (41.12%)

9/51 (17.65%)

0.006

2.330 (1.235–4.396)

Live birth rate/ET (%)

44/91 (48.35%)

9/45 (20.00%)

0.003

2.418 (1.298–4.502)

  1. Categorical variables are presented as proportion (%)
  2. For comparisons of dichotomous variables, χ2 test was used
  3. CI confidence interval, ET embryo transfer, RR relative risk