Do male engagement and couples’ communication influence maternal health care-seeking? Findings from a household survey in Mozambique

Table 5 Factors associated with institutional delivery

	Institutional delivery without BPCR (n = 1320)				Institutional delivery with BPCR (n = 1316)
	Adjusted^a Odds Ratio	95% CI		p-value	Adjusted^a Odds Ratio	95% CI		p-value
	Adjusted^a Odds Ratio	min	max	p-value	Adjusted^a Odds Ratio	min	max	p-value
Male attendance in ANC
No	1	1	1	.	1	1	1	.
Yes	1.22	0.81	1.83	0.35	0.95	0.63	1.43	0.81
Couples’ communication on FP
No	1	1	1	.	1	1	1	.
Yes	1.46	1.02	2.10	0.04*	1.33	0.94	1.89	0.11
BPCR element A: Save money
No BPCR	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	.
BPCR without partner	.	.	.	.	0.71	0.38	1.30	0.27
BPCR with partner	.	.	.	.	1.12	0.73	1.73	0.60
BPCR element B: Arrange transport
No BPCR	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	.
BPCR without partner	.	.	.	.	3.88	1.03	14.62	0.05*
BPCR with partner	.	.	.	.	4.31	2.64	7.02	< 0.01*
BPCR element C: Choose birth companion
No BPCR	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	.
BPCR without partner	.	.	.	.	0.70	0.39	1.25	0.22
BPCR with partner	.	.	.	.	0.76	0.51	1.15	0.20
BPCR element D: Choose delivery site
No BPCR	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	.
BPCR without partner	.	.	.	.	1.52	0.81	2.83	0.19
BPCR with partner	.	.	.	.	1.98	1.16	3.36	0.01*

* P-value significant at 0.05 level. ^aAdjusted for education, province, residence, wealth

ISSN: 1471-2393