Skip to main content

Table 2 Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who had institutional deliveries compared with those who had non-institutional delivery

From: “Midwives do not appreciate pregnant women who come to the maternity with torn and dirty clothing”: institutional delivery and postnatal care in Torit County, South Sudan: a mixed method study

Characteristic

N(%)

1. Age (years)

  ≤ 20

84 (20.1)

 21–30

143 (34.2)

  > 30

44 (10.5)

 Don’t know

147 (35.2)

 Mean age

24.8 (SD = 6.2)

 Range

11–40

2. Parity

 1

65 (15.6)

 2–5

230 (55.0)

  > 5

86 (20.6)

 Missing

37 (8.7)

 Mean

3.8 (SD = 2.5)

 Range

1–17

3. Payam of residence

 Nyong

229 (54.8)

 Himodonge

189 (45.2)

6. Level of School attendance

 None

256 (60.5)

 Primary

126 (30.1)

 Secondary

28 (6.7)

 Tertiary

2 (0.5)

 Missing information

9 (2.2)

7. Antenatal care (ANC) attendance at least once

 Yes

306 (73.2)

 No

100 (23.9)

 Missing

12 (2.9)

8. Place of delivery

 Home

287 (68.7)

 Health facility

116 (27.7)

 Missing information

15 (3.6)

9. The principle person who conducted the delivery

 Friend/ Relative/ Neighbor

165 (39.5)

 TBA

108 (25.8)

 Village doctor/ Traditional herbalist

5 (1.2)

 Self

9 (2.2)

 Doctor

14 (3.3)

 Nurse midwife

99 (23.7)

 Other

6 (1.4)

 Missing information

12 (2.9)

9. Mode of delivery

 Normal vaginal delivery

390 (93.3)

 Vaginal delivery with vacuum extraction

3 (0.7)

 Delivery by caesarean section

8 (1.9)

 Missing information

17 (4.1)

10. Postnatal care (PNC) attendance at least once

 Yes

94 (22.5)

 No

309 (73.9)

 Missing information

15 (3.6)

11. Reason for first PNC visit

 For a problem

12 (12.8)

 Just for a check

60 (63.8)

 Not sure

22 (23.4)