Table 6 Cost-effectiveness results
Study | Country | Intervention | Analytic view point | Quality | Cost-effectiveness measure | Cost-effectiveness result (US$ 2016) | GDP per capita | Neonatal Mortality Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protective Effectiveness (%) | Control group | ||||||||
Bang 1999 [38] | India | Home-based neonatal care by village health workers | Program | Low | per neonatal death averted | 13.86 | 1940 | 36.0 | 58.6 |
Pitt 2016 [43] | Ghana | Home visits made to pregnant women and their babies in the first week of life by community-based surveillance volunteers | Provider perspective | High | per discounted life-year saved | 319 | 1641 | 11.0 | 32.8 |
LeFevre 2013 [40] | Bangladesh | Home visit made by community health workers to offer MNH services including postnatal home visits | Societal perspective (included program, provider and household costs) | High | Cost per neonatal death averted | 2939 | 1517 | 22.0 | 43.7 |
Cost per DALY averted | 103.44 | ||||||||