Association between ovarian reserve and preeclampsia: a cohort study

Table 2 Association between preeclampsia status and baseline serum concentration of AMH levels using the Buckley-James method^a (n = 781)

	Relative difference in AMH, (mg/L) (95% CI)
PE Vs. non-PE	0.06 (−0.26, 0.14)
Adjusted for age(year)	0.01 (−0.26, 0.24)
Adjusted for age(year) and BMI(kg/m²)	0.0 (−0.25, 0.25)
Adjusted for age(year), BMI(kg/m²) and smoking status(ever/never)	0.01 (−0.26, 0.24)
Adjusted for age(year), BMI(kg/m2), smoking status (ever/never)and family history of hypertension(yes/no)	0.02 (−0.23, 0.27)

PE experienced preeclampsia during follow ups; non-PE not experienced preeclampsia during follow ups; BMI body mass index; AMH anti-mullerian hormone
^a Buckley-James method was used as linear regression analysis with censoring on log-transformed AMH,if the AMH level was undetectable (<.16 mg/L), AMH values were censored

ISSN: 1471-2393