Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Rationale and design of two prospective, multicenter, observational studies on reproductive outcome in women with recurrent failures after spontaneous or assisted conception: OTTILIA and FIRST registries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Michela Villani
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M. Baris Ata
25 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Merviel
27 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Villani
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Merviel
27 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Villani
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Villani
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
13 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12884-019-2444-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement