Skip to main content

Table 1 Classification of episiotomy practices: Burgundy perinatal network data, vaginal deliveries, 2011–2012

From: A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network

Classification of episiotomy practices

Number of episiotomies / Number of women

Episiotomy rate of each group (%)

Relative size of each group (%)a

Contribution of each group to episiotomy rate (%) b

1 – Nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, non-instrumental delivery

1942/ 7987

24.3

28.7

39.3

2 – Nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, instrumental delivery

1381/ 2972

46.5

10.7

28.0

 2a – Forceps/ spatula delivery

801/ 1223

65.5

4.4

16.2

 2b – Vacuum delivery

580/ 1749

33.2

6.3

11.8

3 – Multiparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, non- instrumental delivery

1066/ 14,237

7.5

51.2

21.6

4 – Multiparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, instrumental delivery

250/ 771

32.4

2.8

5.1

 4a – Forceps/ spatula delivery

140/ 247

56.7

0.9

2.8

 4b – Vacuum delivery

110/ 524

21.0

1.9

2.2

5 – All women with a single cephalic pregnancy at < 37 weeks gestation

164/ 1172

14.0

4.2

3.3

6 – All women with a single breech pregnancy

72/ 374

19.3

1.3

1.5

7 – All women with multiple pregnancy

61/ 270

22.6

1.0

1.2

Total

4936/ 27,783

17.8

100

100

  1. anumber of women in the group / total number of women delivered
  2. bnumber of episiotomies in the group / total number of women having episiotomy