Skip to main content

Table 2 Service use and weight recording practices across the 3 study cohorts

From: Implementation of gestational weight gain guidelines - what’s more effective for ensuring weight recording in pregnancy?

 

Cohort 1 (n visits = 38,785)

Cohort 2 (n = 32,694)

Cohort 3 (n = 24,623)

p-value

Date range (months)

April 2014–June 2015 (15)

July 2015–September 2016 (15)

October 2016–December 2017 (15)

 

Proportion of women with weight each visit recorded (overall) (%)

4.2%

18.9%

61.8%

< 0.001

Weight recorded at booking visit

92.2%

84.8%

92.2%

< 0.001

Proportion of women with weight each visit recorded (%) – By clinician group

   

< 0.001

by Midwives

4.0%

20.7%

62.5%

 

by Doctors

4.1%

7.6%

53.3%

 

By model of care

   

< 0.001

In the hospital

4.0%

15.7%

56.6%

< 0.001

In the community

4.0%

24.7%

69.8%

< 0.001

By ppBMI category

   

< 0.001

  < 18.5 kg/m2

5.7%

22.0%

64.6%

< 0.001

 18.5–24.9 kg/m2

3.8%

17.3%

60.9%

< 0.001

 25–29.9 kg/m2

3.6%

20.0%

62.0%

< 0.001

 30 + kg/m2

5.8%

21.5%

63.5%

< 0.001

  1. Data are presented as % (n/N) for categorical variables. IQR interquartile range, pp pre-pregnancy, BMI body mass index