Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas

Table 4 Indications for CS among women in group 1

Indication	Absolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2012	Absolute contribution to the CS rate in group 1, %, 2014	p value	Absolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2012	Absolute contribution to the overall CS rate, %, 2014	p value
FC (without oxytocin)	22.1 94/426	15.9 54/340	p = 0.032	2.6 94/3626	1.5 54/3502	p = 0.002
Dystocia	70.4 300/426	74.1 252/340	p = 0.258	8.3 300/3626	7.2 252/3502	p = 0.089
CCD without oxytocin	11.7 50/426	10.0 34/340	p = 0.447	1.4 50/3626	1.0 34/3502	p = 0.11
CCD with oxytocin	17.6 75/426	20.0 68/340	p = 0.401	2.1 75/3626	2.9 68/3502	p = 0.704
ICD without oxytocin	7.5 32/426	6.2 21/340	p = 0.472	0.9 32/3626	0.6 21/3502	p = 0.165
ICD with oxytocin	22.5 96/426	27.9 95/340	p = 0.085	2.6 96/3626	2.7 95/3502	p = 0.865
FC with oxytocin^a	11 47/426	10.0 34/340	p = 0.646	1.3 47/3626	1.0 34/3502	p = 0.194
Others	7.5 32/426	10.0 34/340	p = 0.222	0.9 32/3626	1.0 34/3502	p = 0.697
Total				11.7 426/3626	9.7 340/3502	p = 0.006

^a“FC with oxytocin” was attributed to “dystocia” because the reason why oxytocin was administered was dystocia

ISSN: 1471-2393