Table 3 The CS rate in 2012 and 2014
From: Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas
Number of CS over total number of women in each group | Relative size of groups, % | CS rate in each group, % | p value | Absolute contribution to the оverall CS rate, % | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 2014 | 2012 | 2014 | 2012 | 2014 | 2012 | 2014 | |||
Group 1 | 426/2776 | 340/2698 | 76.6 2776/3626 | 77.0 2698/3502 | 15.3 | 12.6 | p = 0.003 | 11.7 426/3626 | 9.7 340/3502 | p = 0.005 |
Group 2 | 440/850 | 326/804 | 23.4 850/3626 | 23.0 804/3502 | 51.8 | 40.5 | p < 0.001 | 12.1 440/3626 | 9.3 326/3502 | p < 0.001 |
Group 2A | 236/646 | 220/698 | 17.8 646/3626 | 19.9 698/3502 | 36.5 | 31.5 | p = 0.052 | 6.5 236/3626 | 6.3 220/3502 | p = 0.697 |
Group 2B | 204/204 | 106/106 | 5.6 204/3626 | 3.0 106/3502 | 100 | 100 | – | 5.6 204/3626 | 3.0 106/3502 | p < 0.001 |
Group 1 and 2 | 866/3626 | 666/3502 | 23.9 | 19.0 | p < 0.001 | |||||