Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 1455 women with vaginal deliveries in the last three years

From: Associations with perineal trauma during childbirth at home and in health facilities in indigenous municipalities in southern Mexico: a cross-sectional cluster survey

Characteristics

Delivered in health facility (532)

Delivered at home (923)

All deliveries (1455)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Ethnic group

Aboriginal

362 (69)

876 (96)

1238 (86)

Mestizo

161 (31)

36 (4)

197 (14)

Age at delivery

14 to 19 years old

66 (12)

111 (12)

177 (12)

20 to 49 years old

466 (88)

811 (88)

1277 (88)

Able to read Spanish

Yes

365 (69)

330 (36)

695 (48)

No

166 (31)

588 (64)

754 (52)

Civil status

Married/co-habiting

502 (95)

888 (97)

1390 (97)

Single

26 (5)

24 (3)

50 (3)

Parity

Primipara

172 (32)

138 (15)

310 (21)

Multipara

358 (68)

782 (85)

1140 (79)

Who attended delivery

Physician

460 (86)

20 (2)

480 (33)

Nurse

59 (11)

17 (2)

76 (5)

Health promotor

8 (2)

8 (0.5)

Traditional midwife

643 (70)

643 (44)

Relative

151 (16)

151 (10)

Nobody

86 (10)

86 (6)

Position during labour and delivery

Upright/semi-upright

40 (8)

760 (83)

800 (56)

Horizontal

482 (92)

152 (17)

634 (44)

Reported perineal tear

Yes

86 (17)

104 (12)

190 (14)

No

429 (83)

793 (88)

1222 (86)

Reported episiotomy

Yes

171 (33)

76a (9)

247 (17)

No

354 (67)

815 (91)

1169 (83)

Reported perineal trauma (tear and/or episiotomy)

Yes

196 (38)

160 (18)

356 (25)

No

315 (62)

733 (82)

1048 (75)

Reported infection of perineal wound

Yes

28 (15)

39 (24)

67 (19)

No

165 (85)

121 (76)

286 (81)

  1. a76 women who delivered at home reported having an episiotomy, although 59 of them were assisted in their delivery by a traditional midwife and only 7 by a doctor or nurse. It is extremely unlikely that the traditional midwife performed an episiotomy, so probably these women in fact had a perineal tear which they reported as an episiotomy (18 of them also reported a perineal tear)