Skip to main content

Table 2 Women’s (n = 1153) and FCHVs’ (n = 159) assessments of MA success using the checklist are compared to CAC providers’ (n = 47) determinations based on standard of care

From: Determination of medical abortion success by women and community health volunteers in Nepal using a symptom checklist

 

Provider assessment MA successful

Provider assessment additional care needed

Total

PPV

NPV

Sn

Sp

 

n

%a

n

%a

n

%a

% (95%, CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

Women’s Assessment

90 (88, 92)

49 (41, 57)

92 (90, 93)

44 (36, 51)

 MA successful

894

78

99

9

993

86

    

 Additional care needed

81

7

77

7

158

14

    

 Total

975

85

176

15

1151b

100

    

FCHVs’ Assessment

90 (88, 92)

41 (34, 49)

89 (87, 91)

44 (36, 51)

 MA successful

868

75

99

9

967

84

    

 Additional care neded

109

9

77

7

186

16

    

 Total

977

85

176

15

1153

100

    
  1. PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, Sn sensitivity, Sp specificity
  2. aNumbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding
  3. b2 women missing self-assessment of success