Study (Year) | Intervention | Outcomes | Outcomes other than maternal and health outcomes | How was the outcome measured and/or valued? | Source | Key assumptions | Outcomes acknowledged but excluded |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battye (2012) [30] | Befriending service (telephone helpline and one-to-one support by trained ‘befriender’ volunteers) | Short-term • Improvements in mental health • Increased awareness of PND and PND support • Increased coping ability Long-term • Reduced infants behavioural problems • Improved infants cognitive functioning • Family functioning improvement Healthcare professionals and volunteers outcomes also measured. | Child, othersa and non-health | Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale, qualitative interviews and evaluation form | Questionnaires, qualitative interviews, monitoring data, and published studies | Intervention benefits will sustain in the future with only 20% drop-off. | – |
Bauer (2011) [42] | Universal health visiting (postnatal screening using EPDS and treatment [CBT+ antidepressant]) | • QALY | – | Utilities for depression states derived from secondary sources. | Without treatment, PND will sustain with a short-term resolution. Symptoms of moderate-to-severe PND are comparable to those of moderate-to-severe depression. | Child and non-health; reasons for their non-inclusion not provided | |
Campbell (2008) [28] | Routine screening programme (using PHQ-2) and treatments (antidepressants, psychological therapies or social support) according to severity of PND. | • PND cases detected • PND cases resolved • QALY | – | PHQ-2, Preference weights for QALYs derived from a secondary source. | Secondary sources, Revicki and Wood [52] | Normal utility six-weeks post-treatment in the treatment responders. Non-responders with mild/moderate depression recover within six months of its onset. PND will sustain in undetected cases and non-responders with severe depression. A linear deterioration or improvement between health states over time. | Child and non-health; child outcomes could not be included due to lack of reliable data |
Hewitt (2009) [36] | Identification 1.EPDS 2. Beck Depression Inventory Treatments 1. Structured psychological therapy 2. Listening visit (Both with preceding additional care) | • QALY | – | Utility weights derived for QALYs from a secondary source. | Effectiveness estimate from a systematic review and meta-analysis, utility values from Revicki and Wood [52] | Non-responders to treatment and usual care would remain depressed until the model endpoint. Women enter the relevant treatment at 6 weeks postnatally. A linear deterioration or improvement between health states over time. | Child and partner/family; these outcomes could not be included due to lack of reliable data |
NCCMH (2014) [38] | Identification 1. EPDS only 2. Whooley questions followed by EPDS 3. Whooley questions followed by PHQ-9 Treatment 1. Facilitated self-help based on CBT principles 2. Listening visits (Both in addition to standard postnatal care) | Identification • QALY Treatment • QALY • PND cases improved and not relapsed | – | EPDS, Whooley question, PHQ-9. Utility weights derived for QALYs from a secondary source. | Effectiveness estimate from meta-analyses, utility values from Sapin and colleagues [53], experts opinion | Identification False negative women could have spontaneous recovery or be identified in the GP follow-up and offered treatment. Only first-line treatments considered and relapse not modelled. Treatment Women who improve remain in the state or relapse until the model endpoint. A linear deterioration or improvement between health states over time. | Child, partner/family and non-health; reasons for excluding non-health outcomes was the lack of relevant evidence |
Stevenson (2010) [40] | Group CBT | • QALY | – | Changes in EPDS scores were translated to changes in utility using secondary data. | Data from Morrell et al. [37] | Benefits would sustain over the 6-month period with linear decline afterwards to zero, a year after the treatment. | Child and partner/family; reasons for their non-inclusion not provided |
Taylor (2014) [34] | Social support (e.g. advocacy, befriending) | • Increased well-being • Increased chances of employment and higher earnings • Long-term beneficial children outcomes • Reduced use of health and social care services • Increased tax revenues • Volunteers benefits | Child, othersa and non-health | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, analysis of a cohort study | Experts, a range of secondary sources | Benefits were estimated from an observational study and an RCT of similar service. Benefits for women and society inferred from experts and a range of published studies. | – |